Recently, the Nevada Supreme Court made a notable ruling concerning the Nevada Green Party, unveiling a 5-2 decision that the reports of Jill Stein, a representative of this minor party, will not be shown on the state’s presidential ballot. The reasoning behind this verdict was a failure to adhere to mandatory petition requirements that contribute to granting the party’s accessibility to the statewide ballot.
Ironically, the instigator of this legal altercation was none other than the Nevada Democratic Party, demonstrating an aversion towards fairness and stirring up unnecessary trouble. In June, mobilizing their legal team like an arsenal, the Democrats lodged a lawsuit against the Nevada Green Party. The base of accusations pinned the Green Party with the charge of invalid signatures on their petition.
The details of the situation highlight that the Green Party had collected a total of 29,500 signatures for their petition. Recognizing this number as thrice the necessary amount for their candidates to have a share on the ballot, the Democrats immediately sprang into action. Suspicion about certain signatures either being outdated or looking tampered with drove the Nevada Democrats to sue the Green Party, fabricating a conflict where none was necessary.
After undergoing a thorough examination, the district court situated in Carson City passed its judgment in August, essentially turning its back on the lawsuit filed by the Democrats. In response, the Democrats chose to modify the original lawsuit, basing it on a technicality about an allegedly improper affidavit. This game of legal back-and-forth, stirred by Democrats, forced the case all the way to the Nevada Supreme Court.
Higher courts observed the incident from a fresh light, and they eventually reversed the prior court’s ruling. The Nevada Green Party, initially granted the right to persist on the Nevada general election ballot, found itself being swiftly removed due to this decision.
At the core of the issue was a small but exception-worthy loophole. The Green Party had submitted a version of the petition that did not include a crucial verification. This verification was a signed agreement that every person signing the petition is confirmed to be a registered voter within the precinct of their residence, a critical miss that seemed too convenient.
To secure a position on the ballot, it is requisite for all minor parties to integrate this voter verification. The miss from the Green Party was opportunistically incorporated by the Nevada Democratic Party into their ongoing lawsuit. As a result, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Democrats and deemed the Green Party unfit for being part of the ballot due to an unmet requirement.
However, it’s worth noting the dissenting verdict of Justices Douglas Herndon and Justice Kristina Pickering. Both believed that the incident was less about the negligence of the Green Party and more about an ‘egregious error’ within the Nevada Secretary of State’s Office. This office, as per their argument, had mistakenly sent the Green Party an affidavit with incorrect specifications – a revelation that casts doubt on the machinations behind the ruling.
Adding insult to injury, the Nevada Green Party was initially sent the wrong sample petition by the secretary of state’s office, which lacked the critical affidavit on voter registration verification. This mistake set the Green Party off on the wrong foot, inadvertently preventing the verification of their petition to meet the standards necessary to represent a minor political party on the ballot.
Surprisingly, the Green Party managed to adhere to protocol during their first petition submission by not using the same form the secretary of state’s office had provided them. However, this initial petition did not consider the section for signers to input their petition district. Following this, the office duly notified the Nevada Green Party of this omission and extended new instructions via email.
Confirming the profound inadequacies on the secretary of state’s part, an internal employee mentioned to the Green Party that they had been working off an ‘older version’ of the form. The employee then directed them to utilize the ‘newer’ form that was laced with the faux affidavit for garnering signatures. This intentionalized error revealed the prejudiced mechanisms that arbitrarily directed the Green Party’s inclusion onto the ballot.
The debacle continued to highlight the secretary of state’s office’s questionable operations. The official online guide for minor political parties looking to apply for a place on the ballot specifies the need for signature verifications from legally registered voters. Despite their failure in providing the correct affidavit, the state supreme court ruled in favor of the precedent, arguing the Green Party could have done more extensive research.
While acknowledging the miscommunication stemming from the secretary of state’s office, the court chose to downplay the scenario as an ‘unfortunate event,’ advocating that the adversity could have been averted via scrupulous inspection. Dismissing the email error as an insignificant gaffe, they suggested that the Green Party could have rectified the incorrect circulator affidavit if they had rigorously scrutinized the petition before putting it to use. As per their statement, the shared shortcomings of the secretary of state’s office and the Green Party resulted in this unfortunate exclusion.
Notably, Herndon and Pickering dissented to this heavy-handed criticism, highlighting how the secretary of state’s office’s mishandling would inevitably lead to a ‘tremendous injustice.’ The office’s vagueness towards the legality of the Green Party’s petition further cast a cloud over their commitment to upholding fair process.
The stakes of this controversial tribunal came into light when previous electoral records showed a glaring disparity in the voter turnout for the parties. The last instance when the Green party had any candidates on the Nevada ballot was during the 2008 presidential race when Cynthia McKinney secured about 1,400 votes. Unsurprisingly, the Nevada Democratic Party, emboldened by Obama’s whopping 532,000 votes, chose not to comment on this recent debacle.
Democrats Bully Nevada Green Party Out of Election appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
