On July 3, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian mandated a halt to Iran’s collaborative efforts with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), following a significant attack on three of Iran’s primary nuclear locations by the United States, while Israel concurrently executed an air raid against Iran. Distinctively intricate and technical discussions are set to take place between Iran and the IAEA, confirmed by the Islamic Republic’s Foreign Ministry, on the precipice of an unprecedented visit by the nuclear oversight body. This comes after Iran severed its links with the IAEA just a month prior.
The prior month had witnessed a deterioration in the relationship between Iran and the IAEA, mainly triggered by a debilitating 12-day air offensive led by Israel and the US in June. This aggressive assault targeted crucial Iranian nuclear infrastructure. Subsequently, on June 12, the IAEA’s board pronounced Iran had violated its obligations against proliferation, and this accusation came right before Israeli airstrikes on Iran that ignited this conflict.
However, the IAEA held back from releasing an immediate response on their deputy head’s maiden visit post the severance, and there won’t be any preplanned attempts to enter Iranian nuclear locations. The Iranian Foreign Ministry’s spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, redirected media inquiries to a potential meeting with the Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi, expressing a sense of prematureness predicting the outcomes of such highly technical and complex discussions.
Baghaei voiced concerns regarding the IAEA’s notably different attitude during Israel’s June war with Iran. He pointed out that the IAEA abstained from a judicious or rational response as ‘targets of strikes were the peaceful facilities of a country that was under constant monitoring.’ He also felt the need for the agency to voice its criticism for what happened strongly.
Minister Aragchi, earlier, specialized that any future collaboration with the agency would require a stamp of approval from Iran’s highest security body, the Supreme National Security Council. The nature of the cooperation would also be redefined. This move would conceivably restrict the investigators’ ability even further to track Tehran’s nuclear program, which had previously been engaged in enriching uranium nearly to the point of weapon-grade level.
Reinforcing his earlier decision, on July 3, President Masoud Pezeshkian directed the country again to cease its cooperation with the IAEA. This directive followed after the aerial assault by the US on major Iranian nuclear centers as Israel concurrently waged air warfare against Iran, causing the death of nearly 1,100 humans, many of whom were military leaders. Iranian counterattacks led to the death of 28 individuals residing in Israel.
In earlier scenarios, Iran has executed restricted IAEA inspections as a tool of manipulating leverage during negotiations with Western nations. The timing of these negotiation talks resumption between Tehran and Washington regarding the nuclear program deal remains uncertain. The state of Iran’s nuclear weapons program has been a subject of examination by US intelligence services and the IAEA, concluding that Iran’s last recorded organized nuclear weapons program was in 2003.
However, Iran has been involved in the enrichment of Uranium up to a level of 60%, which represents a minor but critical technical stride away from weapon-grade quantities of 90%. This development has cast a considerable shadow over the possibility of a peaceful resolution to Iran’s conflict with the IAEA and estimations of a return to negotiations with the USA and other international partners.
Given the complexity of the situation, both at a technical level and a geopolitical level, it is expected that future dialogues will be challenging. The state of post-war geopolitical relations, combined with unique technical challenges that Iran’s nuclear policy imposes, makes for a hazardous and volatile mix.
These developments potentially result in exacerbating tensions, not just between Israel and Iran, but also globally, given Iran’s pivotal role in the international oil market. Depending on how all parties navigate this complex scenario, the implications of this situation could stretch far beyond the borders of Iran and Israel.
Nevertheless, the International Atomic Energy Agency’s official visit marks a potential starting point in rebuilding trust and restarting dialogue. The coming weeks and months will be crucial, and the world will be watching closely for any signs of progress and change.
It’s uncertain whether the current distributions in Iran’s relationship with the International Atomic Energy Agency will lead to complete normalization or a continuation of the existing situation. It’s also unclear whether the negotiations context, with historical bombings adding a grave element to the discussions, will affect the outcome in any way.
However, what is clear is that the stakes are high. Any potential missteps could trigger a broader conflict with potential international implications. Equally, progress could potentially reshape the diplomatic landscape in the region, leading to meaningful advancements towards peace.
There is an inherent hope that all parties involved continue to pursue a path towards reconciliation, amidst the very real and troubling threats posed by nuclear weapons. This scenario highlights once again the key role the IAEA plays as an international watchdog in maintaining global peace and security.
Despite the difficulties and challenges, the importance of a well-negotiated solution is recognized by all parties involved. As the world moves forward, it’s crucial to remember that diplomacy, despite its complexities and challenges, remains the most effective way to ensure peace, stability, and security.
The post Diplomatic Tensions Rise: Iran Halts Collaboration with IAEA appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
