Elliott Abrams, noted for his extensive career as an international security consultant, has been an influential figure in multiple presidential administrations including those of Reagan, George W. Bush, and Donald Trump. Recognized as a figurehead of neoconservatism, Abrams holds significant expertise in Middle Eastern politics, as evidenced with his senior fellowship at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Throughout 2019 to 2021, Abrams functioned as the U.S. Special Representative for Venezuela, assuming a pivotal role in guiding the U.S.’s relationships with other nations. Colossal, as his influence was, it was his subsequent appointment as the U.S. Special Representative for Iran in 2020 that truly marked his political career.
However, Abrams career is equally marked by controversy, specifically his role in the Iran-Contra scandal that unfolded during the Reagan administration. His actions culminated in his conviction in 1991 for two misdemeanor counts related to unlawfully withholding information from Congress.
Despite the condemnation, Abrams’ political journey did not end there. George H. W. Bush, the then-president, provided Abrams with a full pardon. The repercussions of his actions, while severe, did not diminish his standing and influence in the realm of foreign policy.
This comprehensive piece primarily centers on the complex Israel-Palestine dynamics and Abrams’ perspectives on the matter. In scrutinizing the feasibility of a two-state solution, Abrams expresses skepticism that such a resolution could come to fruition anytime soon.
His skepticism is derived from multiple factors, one of the key points being the reluctance of the Palestinians to acknowledge and peacefully coexist with Israel. Interestingly, this sentiment of rejection appears mutual, with Israel sharing a similar lack of willingness to support the creation of an independent Palestinian state.
Furthermore, Abrams highlights another major obstacle to this two-state solution, which is the entrenched antagonism of the Palestinian leadership towards Israel, often expressed in violent discourses and actions. Such belligerence poses tremendous challenges to the emergence of a mutually agreed-upon solution.
Amidst these complexities, Abrams proposes a potential alternative solution: the involvement of Jordan in the administration of a Palestinian state. He underscores that this proposition has a historical basis and brings tangible benefits to the table.
Simultaneously, Abrams also sheds light on the pitfalls associated with this proposition. The very idea of Jordanian governance is unwelcome among the Palestinian population, which is one significant impediment to this solution.
In parallel, Jordan’s receptiveness towards this solution is equally problematic. Their perception of Palestine as a hotbed of terrorism leaves them hesitant to engage, thus further complicating the situation.
Given all these complicating circumstances and disputing interests, the path towards a peaceful solution remains arduous. The puzzle seems too complex to solve, and the chances of reaching a feasible solution in the foreseeable future appear slim.
Still, Abrams calls for a patient approach, understanding that the situation remains fluid and that the key players’ positions may evolve. Anticipating the unpredictable nature of international politics, he believes that it is crucial to remain observant and open to adjustments, as needed.
Breakthroughs are often unexpected, and pertinent to this is the fact that both parties’ feelings and political strategies may shift – even if currently this seems unlikely. Thus, a watch-and-wait approach may prove, not pessimistic, but strategically valuable.
While the situation appears bleak currently, it is important to understand that the stance of nations can pivot quickly under the right circumstances. History has shown us that enduring conflicts can potentially evolve toward peaceful resolutions, albeit with patient diplomacy and the collective will for change.
In conclusion, Abrams views on the Israel-Palestine dilemma, while stark, reflect a deep understanding of the entrenched complexities and historical roots of this issue. Although his predictions are not positive, they underscore the need for ongoing dialogue, perseverance, and the ceaseless quest for peace in this volatile region.
The post Elliott Abrams: A Voice of Skepticism on Two-State Israel-Palestine Solution appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
