In the wake of his election, President-designate Elon Musk categorically dismantled the initial budget plan, and made an unsuccessful effort to elevate the deficit cap. It could be necessary for him to engage Vice President-elect Donald Trump to ensure a seamless transition to the presidential office. My stance aligns with that of Sen. Mitch McConnell, who advocates for polio vaccinations and condemns the anti-vaccine sentiments propagated by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. McConnell, a polio survivor of the 1950s, as well as two acquaintances of our family, serves as potent reminders of the vaccine’s importance. Upon the release of the Sabin and Salk vaccines, our immediate family seized the opportunity to safeguard our health. The global prevalence of polio, once at 50,000 cases annually, rapidly plunged to virtually zero. I urge the Senate to decline RFK’s confirmation, potentially saving countless lives.
With regard to the committee’s evaluation on which schools in Santa Rosa should be shuttered to alleviate the district’s financial strain, it seems they have overlooked pertinent issues like school attendance and academic performance. As a past parent and present grandparent of a Proctor Terrace student, I am taken aback. The closure of high attendance schools, which are prime candidates for substantial state funding, in favor of those with dismal attendance, is puzzling. What sort of example does this set for stakeholders? Aren’t more public funds beneficial? Why should a performing school internationally recognized for its academic excellence be shuttered? How does that benefit the students?
Closing a school isn’t simply about bricks and doors, but it significantly impacts those whose educational achievements have been remarkable. Is this really the way to appreciate our students’ hard work? Aren’t we punishing them unfairly by shutting their place of learning? Prominent schools typically signify eager teachers, engaged parents, and satisfied learners. In my view, these are the kind of institutions that deserve commendation, not termination. It may be wise to re-evaluate this approach.
California’s political responses to Donald Trump’s threats of mass deportation have generally leaned towards defensive, blanket protection for all undocumented immigrants. Such stances presumably extend to those who have committed severe offences. Logically and popularly, supporting violent criminals is difficult to justify considering public safety. Those advocating for undocumented immigrants should acknowledge the need to distinguish between convicted criminals likely to pose continued threats and those who have contributed meaningfully to our society.
Planning for this mass deportation presents financial and practical challenges. As it progresses, it becomes necessary to prioritize certain cases. Instead of taking a hardline stance against all deportations, our representatives may find it beneficial to propose constructive criteria for differentiating who stays and who leaves. Choosing an excessively defensive stance reduces the chances of achieving a mutually acceptable agreement.
Gradually, the two-party system seems to be eroding the foundations of our democratic republic. Its effects foster an environment of intense polarization, where winning often takes precedence over public service. Upon the re-election of Donald Trump, there’s a looming danger of our republic sliding into oligarchy. As it stands, the Supreme Court tilts predominantly conservative, filled with appointees from republicans who haven’t secured a popular vote – a sign of corporate influence.
The gradual undermining of the 14th Amendment has emboldened GOP-led states to enact restrictive voting laws, effectively disenfranchising many voters. The false rhetoric surrounding the purported stolen 2020 election is a pervasive narrative within the Trump-supporting GOP. Mitch McConnell’s obstructionist tactics provide yet another example. He declined to hold a Senate vote for Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Merrick Garland, under the pretence of letting the people decide, yet he ratified Amy Coney Barrett as a Trump nominee shortly before the 2020 election.
The hyperpolarization induced by the duopolistic party system is pushing our democratic republic into the annals of history. The mighty Roman Empire, too, crumbled from internal strife – a potent warning if ever there was one. Despite the lessons offered by history, mankind seems destined to repeat its mistakes. Abraham Lincoln poignantly pointed out that ‘A house divided against itself cannot stand’. We need to unite in these challenging times, before it’s too late.
Elon Musk’s First Budget Rejection appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
