Members of the Biden administration’s former staff have vigorously defended their stance against past Vice President Kamala Harris. In her soon-to-be-published memoir, Harris conveyed her significant doubts about Biden’s choice to run for reelection. In response to her claims, Biden’s aides have suggested that she harbors resentment as her aspirations for the 2024 presidential run fell flat.
Harris’s memoir, aptly titled ‘107 Days’, targeted for a September 23 release, indicates Harris’s feelings of being caught in a tricky situation as Biden contemplated his run. Drawing from published excerpts in The Atlantic, it’s clear her unease about openly advising Biden against running was palpable. Her restraint was mainly triggered by fears of appearing self-serving, worried that Biden might perceive it as undermining or even traitorous.
However, Biden’s ex-workers are openly deriding Harris’s claims. One unidentified recent White House official, in a discussion with Axios, stated that Harris was fundamentally ‘unfit for the role.’ The official further critiqued that she had no substantial involvement in core administrative operations and mocked her attempts at being in the limelight through orchestrated photo sessions, which only showed her incompetence.
Harris defended her failed 2024 campaign, asserting that the curtained timeline of just 107 days was the primary reason for its downfall. However, another associate of Biden’s rejected her excuse, highlighting that the fault was entirely Harris’s. According to the official, ‘The unpredictable variable in the scenario is the vice president, not Biden or his staff.’
Various critics questioned Harris’s assertion of receiving insufficient support from Biden’s team. One official claimed that numerous members attempted to propel her towards success. ‘Several officials genuinely endeavored to help her succeed. However, she and her team failed to utilize and optimize this support. It’s all rather unfortunate,’ the former aide lamented.
Conversely, another advisor vehemently denied Harris’s allegation that her reticence about Biden’s reelection bid was based on loyalty. The official questioned, ‘I’m unsure that the robust defense of lacking the audacity to voice her concerns about Biden’s candidacy at the time is as convincing as she assumes it to be.’ This claimed loyalty seemed to be misplaced, indeed.
Perhaps the most biting criticism was made by a Biden team member, who twisted Harris’s campaign slogan into a scornful prophecy about her political journey. Asked about her chances for a 2028 run, the official retorted, ‘We’re not going back.’ A clear disapproval of even considering such an eventuality.
Harris’s upcoming memoir has already sparked intense discussions within Democratic factions, causing a reemergence of the discord experienced during the chaotic 2024 race. This has led to new doubts about her capacity to undertake another crack at the presidency.
Despite the memoir revealing her internal conflicts, Harris’s portrayal as trapped and uncertain does little to elevate her standing. Instead, it appears to uncover layers of political ineptitude and raises questions surrounding her decision-making during her short-lived presidential run.
The allegations made by Harris against Biden and his team not only undermine her culpability in her unsuccessful campaign but also suggest an inability to take responsibility for her shortcomings. Instead of pressing on forged alliances and diplomatic strategy, she seems to have relied more on victimhood narrative.
The digs made at Harris by the former Biden aides suggest a deeply-rooted issue at the heart of the matter – the question of loyalty. If Harris truly did withhold her thoughts on Biden’s candidacy as a token of solidarity, such misplaced loyalty should raise eyebrows, particularly when it leads her to impugn her political career.
The unveiled bitterness between Harris and the former Biden aides has exposed seams within the Democratic party. Such disputes do nothing to foster unity, but rather push the divide further, marring the image of stability they strive to uphold.
Ironically, Harris’s self-defense and attempt at painting a sympathetic picture may have opposite consequences. Instead of gaining support, the memoir might end up cementing her reputation as someone who is more suited for the sidelines rather than the center stage.
In final analysis, all this brings about the impression that Harris may be more distinguished by her political blunders and failed campaigning attempts than any actual achievements. Her potential future in politics appears questionable at this point, raising an eyebrow on her ability to sustain another shot at the presidency.
The post Failed Expectations: Harris’s Fumbled Bid and the Biden Administration’s Scathing Critique appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
