The current government, led by the Trump administration, has significantly reduced the federal subsidy for programs aimed at mitigating gun violence in the United States. This reduction corresponds to the cancellation of $158 million in grants, formerly allocated to various groups located in major cities including New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington, DC, and Baltimore.
From the 145 community violence intervention (CVI) grants, amounting to over $300 million, granted via the U.S. Department of Justice, it has been observed that 69 grants were abruptly cut off in April. These CVI programs formed part of a larger scheme facilitated by the Office of Justice Programs in the department, which is responsible for issuing grants.
In April, the Office of Justice Programs, in a sweeping move, ceased 365 grants carrying a value of $811 million. These grants previously had a significant influence on various public safety initiatives and victim services programs.
A spokesperson for the Department of Justice stated that these grants, specifically those related to gun violence, were cancelled due to them failing to achieve the program’s objectives or align with the organization’s priorities. It’s estimated that thousands of grants from the Office of Justice Programs are undergoing review, assessed based on their effectiveness in assisting law enforcement and their contribution to the reduction of violent crime.
The bulk of CVI grants were initially funded through the 2022 Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, part of an initiative led by former U.S president Joe Biden to curb the rise of gun violence in America. To effectuate this, the first-ever White House Office for Gun Violence Prevention was established. However, with the advent of the Trump administration, this office was dissolved.
Before the provision of Biden-era funding, most of the programs aimed at preventing gun violence were financed at the state level. About half a decade ago, these programs, although existent, were underfunded and lacked substantial federal investment and therefore, operated on considerably smaller budgets.
The CVI grants, deemed integral by many, supported a comprehensive array of programs designed to prevent potential shootings. These initiatives included training outreach teams in conflict resolution and mediation, employing social workers to link individuals to services and job opportunities, and establishing hospital-based programs dedicated to assisting victims of gun-related crimes.
According to the data, gun-related deaths in the U.S have increased by over 50% between the years 2015 to 2021, recording a high of 21,383 incidents in the latter year. However, there is a silver lining as these numbers have since begun to decrease.
Although a larger portion of the gun violence prevention funding was received by cities such as New York City, Chicago, and Los Angeles, cities situated in the south, namely Memphis, Selma in Alabama, and Baton Rouge in Louisiana, also garnered millions of dollars in funding. Given the relative shortage of state support for such initiatives, these southern cities were more reliant on the grants.
The recent cutbacks cast doubt on the future viability of community violence intervention strategies that took years to put into place. These strategies are particularly crucial in predominantly Black and Latino communities where they’ve been integrated effectively.
The effectiveness of the CVI programs has been a contentious issue among critics, with some suggesting that federal financial resources would be better directed towards law enforcement efforts to control gun violence. Others perceive these initiatives as inherently anti-gun and merely conduits for transferring federal tax money to non-governmental organizations that oppose gun ownership.
Contrary to these views, many in law enforcement disagree. As recently as June, 18 law enforcement groups hailing from cities including Louisville, Minneapolis, Tucson, and Omaha, penned a letter calling on the Attorney General to restore funding, pointing to the ‘measurable and significant reductions in violence and homicides’ achieved via these programs.
Organizations grappling with the shortfall of federal funds are striving to devise ways to keep operational, highlighting the gravity of these federal grant cuts.
The post Federal Subsidy for Gun Violence Prevention Programs Sees Major Cutback Under Trump Administration appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
