The eminent Han Duck-soo is being discussed as a formidable selection for the special diplomatic envoy to facilitate talks between the United States and South Korea, revolving around tariffs and related subjects. Following U.S. President Donald Trump’s formal announcement of a 25% reciprocal tariff on all South Korean exports commencing August 1, rapid diplomatic negotiations have become essential. Deploying a special envoy to Washington has transitioned from mere formal procedure to strategic necessity. The selected envoy will play a pivotal role in direct interactions with high-ranking U.S. officials, possibly even President Trump, addressing critical issues like tariff agreements, the division of defense expenditure, and mutual trade, energy, and investment matters.
Contrary to the urgency of the situation, there are indications that the Lee Jae Myung administration is finding it challenging to conclude their decision, as political deliberations and indecision continue to prolong the process. Based on media documentation, some individuals within the ruling faction are promoting a complete reassessment of the nomination. In response to questions regarding this nomination, importantly, the presidential office gave a noncommittal reply, equating the speculation to ‘discussing divorce before marriage’. Such comments imply that although Kim may have initially been under consideration, increased political opposition appears to have caused the authorities to reconsider this option.
Simultaneously, the August 1 deadline looms, while the nomination of a competent and effective envoy is yet to be resolved. Time is running out for South Korea as President Trump’s tariff decision has been formalized. An envoy selection can no longer be postponed; it has now become strategically mandatory. The appointed person must be skilled in comprehending the intricate political and economic environment of Washington and be capable of engaging with top U.S. officials to deal with the plethora of key bilateral matters, from tariffs and defense expenditure to investment and energy collaboration.
At this juncture, the government’s focus ought to be on credibility, precision, and results. This is where former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo warrants serious consideration for the role. Though Han does not have a direct, personal connection with President Trump, he is reported to have formulated a positive relation during a telephonic conversation.
Trump is said to have praised Han’s comfortability with English, which may have sparked a sense of familiarity, given that Han is a Harvard-trained economist while Trump graduated from the reputed Wharton School. This personal connection, albeit minor, could set the tone for future discussions and significantly aid in high-risk negotiations, where personal chemistry comes into play. Han, in comparison with Kim, is expected to initiate a productive dialogue with President Trump, a necessity for Korea under the prevailing situation.
Along with acceptable personal relationships, Han carries a striking portfolio of international policy experience. He is recognized as one of Korea’s leading authorities on trade and economic diplomacy, having served in positions across the Ministry of Commerce and the Ministry of Trade and Industry, in addition to being the country’s first chief trade negotiator. His resume extends to an ambassadorial role in the U.S., and notably, his stint as prime minister under both progressive and conservative governments, earning bipartisan endorsement.
Han’s repertoire of knowledge extends from trade, security to understanding American politics and customs. His vast abilities make him arguably the most qualified person to handle an unpredictable and quid pro quo oriented counterpart such as Trump. His most advantageous skill is his ability to converse with the U.S. president without the need for a translator, a boon in the context of negotiation.
The stakes involved are enormously high. The role of the envoy surpasses the job of addressing tariffs, it includes resolving disputes over non-tariff obstacles, securing investment opportunities like the Alaska LNG project, and guiding through complex defense-related negotiations that entail cost-sharing for U.S. forces stationed in Korea. Any oversight could have negative implications for Korea’s future economic and strategic stance.
To comprehend the essence of Trump, one may refer to a 2016 Korean newspaper interview where he claimed, ‘I sleep 28 hours a week and read 28 hours a week.’ Trump’s excellence goes beyond being a real estate mogul; he is a perpetual student of negotiation tactics. Sun Tzu’s ‘The Art of War’, a book focused on archaic military strategies, is among Trump’s preferred reads, which emphasizes the concept of winning without actual conflict. Also, he authored ‘The Art of the Deal’ in 1987, an influential factor in his global recognition.
Opposing someone like Trump requires not just policy knowledge but strategic discernment and mental discipline. However, the concept of appointing Han as the special envoy may seem extremely politically challenging today. Han is viewed as a contentious figure among individuals in Lee’s coalition. Some may view Han’s nomination as a divergence from the political reform agenda.
Despite the controversy, this situation presents an opportunity for Lee to exhibit his leadership if he is genuinely seeking national unity and international credibility. Such circumstances require a leader to rise above political biases and place the national interest above all. During the past few weeks, Lee has surprised many with his political inclusiveness such as retaining a minister from the previous government, initiating discussions with opponent leaders, and promoting dialogue within the business network.
Lee’s gestures towards political integration have had positive effects like market stabilization, improved investment confidence, and an increase in his approval rating post-election results. Nomination of Han as the envoy would be an extension of the same leadership quality. The implication of appointing Han, regardless of the negotiation results, reflects the seriousness and the maturity of the Lee administration, domestically and internationally.
During times of crisis, personal risk may be the cost of invaluable leadership. What is needed now is not just adept diplomacy but an equally crucial decision.
The post Han Duck-soo: The Diplomatic Envoy Choice for U.S. – South Korea Tariff Talks? appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
