William Henry Harrison, the country’s ninth president, marks an irony of history as the final US leader born under British dominion. He paymastered a brief but record-setting stint as president, delivering the most prolonged inauguration speech ever, only to have his presidency cease thereafter due to his untimely demise just 31 days later. Harrison’s political pursuit also caught the eyes of history; he lost his initial presidential run only to secure a victory in the subsequent attempt. This peculiarity rendered Harrison a political rarity, with only Richard Nixon matching this feat. Others, like Grover Cleveland and Donald Trump, lost the presidency only to reclaim it later.
This historical sway of political success and defeat draws a rather bleak spectacle for Kamala Harris. The recent development of her stepping away from a potential gubernatorial race in California fans the rumors of her intentions to once again chase the presidential dream. This, however, doesn’t bode well when assessed against the backdrop of the current political landscape. Another presidential brainwave may not promise fruits for Harris given the Democratic Party’s plummeting popularity levels.
The Democratic Party’s woes continue as their net favorability languishes at nearly triple the negatives of the GOP. This slump brings them to their least popular state in over three decades. The party seems to be entwined in a web of dissatisfaction, arising from their failure to obstruct Trump in office. This fractious environment inevitably casts a daunting shadow over Harris’s political aspirations.
As a representative of the Democratic Party, Harris mirrors the public’s growing dissatisfaction with the party’s performance. However, this discontent spans across different factions within the party. While progressives are disgruntled by the party’s lax opposition, the more moderate Democrats deplore the party’s deviation to extreme left ideologies embodied in cultural warfare and identity politics. A common thread connects these divided factions under the Democratic umbrella, a profound urge to carve out a victory.
Harris’s potential 2024 nomination heavily banked on her being chosen as a diversity pick. However, Biden made it clear beforehand that he had intended to select a female and later an African American running mate. This makes it evident that Harris’s grim prospects don’t emerge from her race or gender; instead, her failure comes from her inability to broaden her reach among Democratic voters.
In order to steer the Democratic party towards a much-needed victory, it’s paramount that their candidate is able to convert Trump supporters. However, Harris has spectacularly failed to do so. This also acts as an indicator that her political failure was not down to a shortfall in the Democratic turnout, but rather her feeble appeal to an evolving electorate. Her flamboyant verbiage seems more suited to a liberal arts college than a presidency.
In this light, her conviction often appears inauthentic, manufactured by the cold calculations of a focus group in an era where voters are ravenous for a genuine politician. Adding to her woes, Harris surrendered to Biden’s demand that she refrain from distancing herself from him. Such strategic missteps illustrate how out of touch Harris is with the current political climate and highlight her inability to connect with voters on a level that surpasses superficial identity politics.
The underwhelming choice for her first on-air interview after stepping down, Stephen Colbert’s ‘The Late Show’, is a testament to her miscalculated outreach strategies. This move may indulge Colbert’s ideologically driven viewership but does little to expand the Democratic voter base. These instances affirm that Democrats need to invigorate and widen their audience, not tickle the ideological fetishes of a select few.
The persistent pattern of failure and the consequent speculated run at the presidency again wrap Harris within an unfavorable historical context. If Harris is poised to run for president once again, her trajectory may only end as a footnote to a political trivia game. This paints an unfavorable portrait for Democrats and their hopefuls.
The Democratic Party’s battleground is riddled with pitfalls – from pandering to the wrong demographics to the lack of a strong leadership figure who can unite their differing factions. These shortcomings cast a grim shadow over their future conquests and set the stage for a lessthan optimistic future under the representatives and leadership of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
The current political climate seems to suggest that Harris’s possible presidential bid may fade into obscurity. Despite being Biden’s diversity running mate, she’s failed to capture a wider audience of voters, suggesting that her influence might only extend to fringe groups within the Democratic Party. The lack of convincing outreach strategies marks a significant underestimation of the political landscape’s complexities.
With the Democratic Party facing discontent on multiple fronts – from their own constituencies to the broader public – it’s clear that drastic measures are required to steer the party back on track. However, the current leadership, which includes Biden and Harris, does not seem to comprehend the need for such serious course correction.
In these turbulent times, the Democratic Party needs a leader who demonstrates authenticity and has a genuine approach to dealing with the changing political landscape. Unfortunately, so far, neither Biden nor Harris has shown these qualities, and their continued political strategies signify a grotesque departure from such norms.
Chasing after ideological purity and identity politics seems to be taking precedence over focusing on broader issues concerning most Americans. Not only does this approach highlight the Democratic leadership’s detachment from its voters, but it also begs the question of whether Harris and Biden even understand the shifting American political landscape.
In conclusion, the role of effective leadership in navigating the Democratic Party out of its present turmoil is essential. However, figures like Biden and Harris appear less capable of this task, exacerbating the current issues with their misguided stances and inability to connect with the electorate.
Under such leadership, the Democratic Party’s future looks uncertain. If they choose to venture down this same path again, with Biden and Harris leading, the history book’s next chapter appears less than promising. Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem that change is on the horizon, leaving Democratic success a distant memory, and the party on a pathway that can only be considered subpar.
The post Harris: A Historical Misstep for the Democratic Party appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
