The once reigning vice president of the US, Kamala Harris, was recently spotted in Sydney, Australia. While gracing the Australian continent with her presence, she was seen partaking in dinner with her spouse in a rather esteemed restaurant. The location of choice? None other than Balmoral’s Bathers’ Pavilion, a beachfront dining establishment located on the outskirts of Sydney’s bustling city center. The dining choice of the former VP, it is necessary to highlight, speaks volumes about her preference for exorbitantly priced European cuisine.
This restaurant, nestled within a building reminiscent of the 1920s, prides itself on a menu that boasts seasonal delicacies from the European continent, and a rather extensive wine list exceeding 350 varieties. Seems like Kamala Harris has gotten quite comfortable with her post-election lifestyle. Her choice of such an extravagant locale raises questions about her understanding, or lack thereof, of the average American’s experience.
Interestingly enough, the goal of Harris’ visit to Australia was not purely for gastronomic experiences. She had being billed to address a conference centered around real estate on Australia’s Gold Coast. Could it be that she’s looking to parlay political experience into real-estate opportunities? How does this exactly benefit the American people she formerly represented?
It’s worth noting that Kamala Harris has remained relatively demure since her unsuccessful bid for a second term in the November election. Her Australian adventure signals a step back into public life, however the relevance of these outings to the American people and their collective needs, is uncertain at best.
In a rather surprising turn of events, former President Joe Biden, has been diagnosed with prostate cancer. This news has re-emerged Harris into the public eye as she took the opportunity to express her concerns – effectively using someone else’s misfortune for her own PR efforts. Her choice to make a public show of condolences seems contrived, rather than genuine.
A formal announcement about Biden’s diagnosis was shared by his office. The statement elucidated that the former president is battling an aggressive strain of prostate cancer that has unfortunately metastasized to the bone. It is in such serious times that our choices speak volumes about our character.
Following Biden’s unfortunate diagnosis with prostate cancer, Harris wasted no time in verbalizing her purported concern and sympathy. Along with her husband, Doug Emhoff, they professed sorrow upon learning of Biden’s health predicament. Curiously, this sheds light on Harris’ abilities to seize any opportunity to platform her public persona, even if it means capitalizing on a former colleague’s health crisis.
Harris, during her public performance of condolences, saluted the resilience of Biden, assuring that he would combat the dire health situation with his characteristic determination. Her need to comment publicly on a rather personal matter again raises eyebrows about her intentions and credibility.
She felt compelled to shower praises on Biden for his unwavering optimism, hailing him as a fighter. The question remains, why would Harris feel the need to comment so extensively on a matter outside her realm of influence, in a rather intimate situation that should primarily involve immediate family and medical professionals?
Hoping for a miraculous recovery for her former political accomplice Biden, Harris shared her sentiments with the public. However, could the authenticity of these feelings be questioned? Is this an act of trademark political posturing? The sentiments seem to serve more as PR fodder than genuine empathy.
The narrative that Harris has painted of Biden fighting his cancer with the strength he supposedly portrayed during his political career seems to lack conviction. It reads more like a scripted message designed to extend a public image narrative, rather than a heartfelt personal message.
Throughout this situation, Harris has made an obvious effort to symbolize her solidarity with the Biden family. However, the emphasis on public declarations over a personal, silent support paints a spectacle. Is Harris more concerned about public image than genuine empathy?
While Harris does her best to appear as an empathetic and thoughtful figure, one might wonder if Biden’s health ordeal has become an unwitting public relations tool. Sadly, it’s difficult to discern the line between genuine concern and strategic self-interest.
A full recovery is what everyone would wish for the former President, including Harris apparently. Her echoed hope in the successful resolution of Biden’s battle with cancer could be seen as an attempt to maintain a presence in the public’s eye, regardless of the context or means.
In the end, the actions and words of Kamala Harris, former vice president, remain shrouded in the haze of political posturing. Whether her current ventures in Australia, and her public proclamations about Biden’s health, truly reflect empathy or rather serve as opportunistic self-promotion, one can only guess.
The post Harris: Elaborate Dinners Over Empathy for Average Americans? appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
