While Kamala Harris has been scouting potential Vice Presidential candidates, her discernment is put to question with Pennsylvania Democratic Governor Josh Shapiro lurking on her shortlist. Shapiro, despite previously maintaining a facade of propriety, has now been marred by considerable allegations. A fellow Democrat revealed that he tried to veil a sexual harassment incident, potentially endangering his standing in the Democratic party.
Accusations criticize Shapiro for not possessing the emotional strength and stability required to play second fiddle to a woman president. Critics fear his ego might obstruct his dedication to the role of Vice President and potentially destabilize a Harris presidency. An unsettling prospect, since a Vice President should seamlessly adapt to a supporting role, prioritizing national interest above personal ambition.
Erin McClelland, an aspirant for Pennsylvania’s state treasurer, was the voice that pierced Shapiro’s veneer of respectability. On a popular social media platform, X, she expressed her reservations about the type of individuals that would be suitable for the role of VP, especially when considering potential hidden, character-related pitfalls.
Asserting her opinion strongly, McClelland said, ‘We require a Vice Presidential candidate secure in his position beneath a female president, someone who would not exploit the presidency for personal electoral gain, someone who doesn’t conceal sexual harassment incidences.’ A clear jab at Shapiro’s alleged behavior and an indication of her lack of confidence in his capacity to fulfill the VP role.
After criticising an unnamed candidate who ominously matched Shapiro’s profile, McClelland rallied support around North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper. In stark contrast to her trepidation for Shapiro, McClelland expressed, ‘We need someone capable of resonating with rural voters. That is @RoyCooperNC.’
When pressed on who precisely her comments were aimed at, McClelland confirmed to the New York Post that it was indeed Shapiro. Stripping his masks and laying bare his inadequacies, her words brought the key issues to the forefront, clearly demarcating what qualifications a candidate in such an influential position must possess.
She warned Kamala Harris of the distressing repercussions of operating with a team uneasy about answering to a woman in a commanding role. McClelland’s call for deep introspection wove a concerning tapestry of potential conflict arising under a Harris presidency, primarily if supported by Shapiro as a Vice President.
Underpinning her assertions, McClelland specifically highlighted the ‘sexual harassment’ scandal Shapiro allegedly tried to hush. His top legislative liaison, Mike Vereb faced accusations of harassing a woman, leading to a settlement cost of $295,000 to Shapiro’s office. However, the full spectrum of events only came to light months later, with Vereb’s resignation.
Shapiro’s conspicuous silence following these allegations and the lack of clarity around the situation adds another layer of disquiet. His failure to publicly address the issue underlines his alleged contempt for accountability and rectitude.
Unfortunately, this pattern of behavior may well expose the Harris administration to criticism and political vulnerability, should she choose to ignore these glaring red flags and select Shapiro as her VP. Decision-making founded in ill judgement could not only mar the entire Harris presidency but risks eroding the public trust vested in the administration.
Although Shapiro’s response to criticism remains to be seen, his previous choice to avoid comment when questioned by the Philadelphia Inquirer suggests a possible evasion of responsibility. This may cast a shadow of doubt and suspicion not just on his personality, but also on his political career.
Given these damning allegations, it is critical for Harris to weigh her VP decision thoroughly. A potential Harris administration must consider reputational risk, public scrutiny and, above all, commitment to fundamental ethical standards. In the end, the essence of a leader is the ability to foresee the team that would uphold the highest tenets of respect and responsibility.
The lessons imparted by these unfolding events are stark reminders for Kamala Harris, and indeed all political figures. Selecting the right VP is not merely about political compatibility but rather ensuring their personal and professional ethics align as well. Shapiro’s case underlines the importance of this selection, hinting at potential obstacles that Biden and Harris could face in their political journey.
Harris Flounders: Flawed VP Pick Could End in Disaster appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
