Kamala Harris, who currently serves as Vice President, has recently attempted to rebrand herself to the public at the Democratic National Convention, a stark shift from her previous stance during her unsuccessful 2019 presidential bid. This shift in political posturing has led to a slight modulation in her previously liberal ideologies, presumably an attempt to distance herself from the ‘far-left’ label bestowed upon her by the astute ex-President Donald Trump.
It’s interesting that the Harris’ camp appears to dodge acknowledging these shifts, possibly due to the potential backlash they may receive. Perhaps this explains the noticeable lack of a formal press conference since she declared her candidacy over a month ago. Some argue this dodging reek of political dishonesty while praising Donald Trump’s consistent, upfront approach.
A closer look at potential shifts in Harris’ stance shows that she has subtly changed her position on several key issues. Energy policy serves as one of the most prominent examples. The previously vocal opponent to fracking, a method of extracting oil and gas, Harris appears to have silenced her objections.
Side-stepping away from her own liberal views, she no longer supports making illegal border crossings a civil issue instead of a criminal one. This is a significant pivot from her past platform. Currently, she aligns herself more with the Biden administration’s harder stance on immigration policies.
Regarding health care, Harris seems to have reversed yet another stance. Despite initially sponsoring and advocating for a ‘Medicare for All’ agenda as a California senator, her current campaign insists that this proposal will no longer be a part of her policy considerations.
Instead, Harris has now chosen to focus on strengthening the existing healthcare system under the Affordable Care Act, known to many as Obamacare. She also voices her support for bringing down the costs of prescription drugs. This appears to be a deliberate shift away from more progressive healthcare proposals, as Harris seeks to align herself with more mainstream Democrats.
Harris’ change in attitude is also evident in her approach to gun control. The mandatory gun buyback program for assault weapons, which she once advocated, no longer finds a place in her reform plans. However, vague mentions of ‘other reforms’ are still part of her campaign’s rhetoric.
Her campaign tried to justify these recent policy swings as the result of ‘three years of effective governance’ and framed this clear flip-flop as a demonstration of her ‘pragmatic approach’ leading towards ‘common-sense solutions for progress’. It’s laughable how, unlike former President Trump’s steady stance maintained over the years, Harris’s positions seem unstable and ever-changing.
A CBS News – YouGov poll has shown that over a third of registered voters struggle to identify what Harris actually supports. The variances in perceived alignment between her policies and those of President Biden reflect the confusion sowed by her policy reversals.
In a sharp contrast to Harris’ shifting positions, Trump’s political views have remained consistent over his distinguished career. One can confirm this by considering his stance on abortion. Even though he identified as ‘pro-choice’ during his life as a private citizen, Trump showed respect for state autonomy by suggesting that decisions on abortion restrictions should be left to each state when he transitioned into politics.
Unlike Harris’ fluctuating position on key issues, Trump has shown a remarkable ability to stand firm in his beliefs. His approach sets an example of how politicians should remain consistent in their values, reflecting the interests of those who elected them.
In conclusion, Kamala Harris’ continual policy changes reveal a lack of concrete principles and reliable leadership. On the contrary, Trump’s steadfast political demeanour offers a stark example of how political leadership should be conducted.
The stark contrast between Harris’ shifting stances and Trump’s consistency only reinforces the notion of the Democratic party’s inconsistency and lack of conviction. As voters, we must be aware and consider these political acrobatics when deciding who to entrust our nation’s future to.
Harris’s Perplexing Policy Pivots Puts Trump’s Consistence in Sharper Contrast appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
