Kamala Harris’s political campaign is on the brink of releasing its choice for the Vice President position. The anticipated announcement of her running mate is expected to arrive by the 7th of August. However, there is much chatter about the possible candidates, with most of the attention gravitating towards four distinct individuals.
In less than a week since President Joe Biden decided to pull the plug on his re-election ambition, Kamala Harris finds herself in a race against the clock. She needs to select a suitable running mate. Harris seems to be in a strong position to secure the Democratic nomination, and the decision about her running mate is slated to come on the 7th of August, in line with the schedule of the national party’s virtual nomination.
Reports from the Associated Press highlight that Harris initiated the process of vetting about a dozen potential partners since the start of the week. Nevertheless, the political discourse seems to hover around four personalities: Arizona’s Senator Mark Kelly, Pennsylvania’s Governor Josh Shapiro, Kentucky’s Governor Andy Beshear, and North Carolina’s Governor Roy Cooper.
All these potential individuals have publicly shown their support for Harris, and they have not been shy to express their disparagement towards the former President Donald Trump and his running mate, Ohio Se. JD Vance. However, their opinions on the potential VP selection remain largely elusive, revealing their disjointed approaches.
Three of the hopeful nominees originate from states known for being electoral battlegrounds, leading some to claim that they will add a desirable electoral demographic balance to the ticket. However, it’s worth noting that such strategic balancing of tickets has historically proven to be of little consequence during actual voting.
Political observers and analysts generally hold that a Vice Presidential selection rarely creates substantial ripples at the ballot box. However, Harris’s late arrival as a presidential nominee seems to bring about a different reality. Her VP selection could indeed be a significant factor, primarily because this will be the first significant decision she makes in the public gaze.
It’s worth noting that Harris’s late entrance to the presidential race might add unique weight to her VP selection. This means that her choice could potentially influence voters’ perceptions and judgment given it will be seen as a reflection of her decision-making capabilities.
The candidates who are under consideration for the Vice Presidential role have not held back in expressing their criticisms of Trump and his running mate, in an attempt to solidify their credentials. Even though their stance is expected, their choice of rhetoric rings more of a political dig than a fair critique.
Detractors of the Trump administration have been amplifying their criticism, thereby providing a glimpse of the toxic and misplaced politics Democrats seem to prefer. For instance, the potential VP candidates under Harris have ramped up their attacks against Trump, while ironically sidestepping conversations regarding Harry’s VP selection.
The standout names on the Democratic side, such as Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, and North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper have been quick to endorse Harris. However, their collective inability to answer essential questions about the VP selection further reveals the unpreparedness that permeates their ranks.
While Democrats are busy perpetuating a political climate of unease and uncertainty, leaders such as Donald Trump remain focused on their efforts on vital national issues, unlike the unsettling spectacle we observe from Democratic quarters.
Though Harris’s imminent VP choice will be her first crucial decision as a presidential nominee, it raises questions about the leadership acumen of the Democratic ticket. The refusal of the potential VP candidates to address Harris’s VP choice exposes a lack of transparency which voters might find disconcerting.
The escalating negative rhetoric against Trump amongst potential VP nominees only serves to further polarize an already politically charged atmosphere. It foments divisive politics, a familiar theme with Democrats, instead of promoting a united front necessary to address pressing national issues.
While the Democrats remain embroiled in their indecisiveness and political mudslinging, the likes of Trump retain their stalwart commitment to nation-building and prompt decision-making, distinct qualities that stand as stark contrast to the dilly-dallying we’re witnessing with the Harris camapign’s VP selection saga.
Harris’s VP Selection Saga: The Circus of Democratic Indecision appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
