The on-hold higher tariffs on Chinese imports by the U.S. is nearing its 90-day termination date, with Tuesday marked as the expiry. A degree of uncertainty prevails, as it’s unknown whether the halt will be extended or not. The previous high-level Sino-American trade talks, conducted towards the end of last month, were followed by both parties expecting about 90 more days of extension on the deadline. While the decision was noted to be in the hands of President Donald Trump by the U.S. representatives, any formal declaration regarding his stand remains absent till now.
This lack of definitive information has pushed businesses into a waiting phase, subtle yet loaded with apprehension. Any move towards amplifying the import tariffs may have the potential of causing turbulence in the international markets. In the past, there have been instances of fluctuating deadlines and tariff rates on the part of Trump, with no clear plan outlined for the forthcoming Tuesday by either participating nation.
Providing an extended timeframe to reach a viable agreement on trade with China can avert the previously voiced threats of soaring tariffs that could potentially reach a staggering 245%. The key intent behind enforcing higher tariffs is to neutralize the significant and persistent trade deficit that the U.S. encounters with China. This deficit plummeted to a 21-year low in July, stimulated by the looming danger of tariffs on China’s export sector.
It isn’t uncommon for the U.S. to drop hints about the current status of negotiations, however, it’s not often we see China breaking their silence until critical decisions have been finalized. The approaching deadline of Tuesday has not elicited any commentary from Beijing, thus far.
In a media interaction, U.S. Vice President JD Vance revealed Trump’s thoughts on imposing supplementary tariffs on Beijing, in view of China’s Russian oil acquisitions. However, Vance clarified that no solid decisions have been made by the president as of yet.
The possibility of an excessively high tariff on Chinese exports to the United States may exert enormous pressure on Beijing, especially given the ongoing recovery phase of its global second-ranked economy from a sustained property market slump. The residual aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic has also forced millions of individuals to turn to temporary ‘gig work’, further straining the employment landscape.
Smaller factories have been particularly impacted due to the increased import taxes on small parcels from China, leading to an uptick in job terminations. However, it’s important to note that the U.S economy is significantly dependent on China for a varied range of goods like household items, apparel, basic computer chips, wind turbine equipment, electric vehicle battery components, and the rare earths required in their production.
This reliance renders Beijing with substantial negotiating power during talks with Washington. Despite the imposition of increased tariffs, China’s competitiveness for numerous products remains intact. It’s also understood by its leadership that the American economy is only now starting to grapple with the consequences of the price surge due to tariff hikes.
Currently, a uniform 10% baseline tariff, along with a supplementary 20% tariff linked to the fentanyl crisis, are imposed on China-origin imports. Certain items invite higher levies. Conversely, American exports entering China face a general tariff of about 30%.
Before the ceasefire was announced, threats of escalating import duties on Chinese commodities to 245% were voiced by Trump. Responding to this, China retorted by declaring it would raise its tariff on U.S. goods to 125%.
A trade war scenario between the world’s biggest economies can have ripple effects affecting global economy. This includes disruptions in industrial supply chains, altering demand for commodities such as oil and copper, and instigating geopolitical tensions tied up to the conflict in Ukraine.
Following a telephonic conversation with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, Trump expressed his anticipation of a face-to-face meeting later this year. Such a prospect presents a positive reinforcement for reaching a trade agreement with Beijing.
Should the truce come apart, there’s a possibility of exacerbated trade tensions and higher tariffs, which can inflict further economic damage. Global markets could be thrown off balance, business investment and employee hiring could slow down, and there could be a significant rise in inflation.
The post Imminent Deadline on U.S. Tariffs Ups Anxiety Amidst Trade Talks with China appeared first on Real News Now.
