On July 3rd, Masoud Pezeshkian, the President of Iran, directed the nation to halt its association with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) following a bombing of three of Iran’s key nuclear facilities by the United States. This military intervention occurred amidst an air assault on Iran conducted by Israel. The forthcoming discussions between Iran and IAEA are expected to be technically intricate, as stated by the Foreign Ministry of the Islamic Republic, giving rise to this situation in the wake of Iran severing all connections with the nuclear watchdog just the previous month.
The rapport between Iran and the watchdog soured significantly due to a series of aggressive air raids on Iran conducted jointly by the US and Israel for duration of twelve days in June. These attacks resulted in substantial damage to important nuclear facilities in Iran. On June 12, it came to light that Iran had violated its obligations related to non-proliferation, this announcement coming from the IAEA board just one day prior to the Israeli airstrikes which ignited the conflict.
The IAEA, notably, did not release any immediate official communication regarding the impending visit of the agency’s deputy head. The visit agenda was void of any access plans to the bombed Iranian nuclear sites. Esmail Baghaei, spokesperson for the Iranian Foreign Ministry, hinted at the possibility of a meeting with Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi, however, he noted it was premature to anticipate any outcomes from the complex technical discussions.
Baghaei did not hold back criticisms of the IAEA, calling attention to its ‘unique situation’ during the Israeli conflict in June. He cited, with considerable vexation, the silence and inaction of the agency during the strikes aimed at peaceful facilities in Iran. According to him, the IAEA overlooked its responsibility to condemn the attacks and did not respond in a ‘wise and rational’ manner, despite having 24-hour surveillance of the situation.
Aragchi, conversely, had earlier declared that any future collaboration with the IAEA would entail approval from Iran’s highest security authority. This implication of the Supreme National Security Council’s involvement is likely to redefine the association guidelines between the two entities. This move could potentially impose further constraints on the inspection accessibility for the agencies, making it increasingly challenging to monitor Tehran’s uranium enrichment program that had been approaching weapon-grade standards.
Masoud Pezeshkian, Iran’s president, issued an order to cease all cooperation with the IAEA on July 3rd. This followed an occurrence where the US targeted and destroyed three main Iranian nuclear facilities with bombings. The attack took place during the course of an aerial warfare campaign conducted by Israel against Iran resulting in the deaths of nearly 1,100 individuals, a substantial portion of which were military officials.
The Iranian response to these coursing events was significant. They retaliated with their own strikes which resulted in the death of 28 individuals within Israeli borders. Historically, Iran has leveraged limiting IAEA inspections as a strategic tool in diplomatic negotiations with Western countries. The immediate future of these discourses remains uncertain, particularly in the light of the recent churn of events.
Also unclear is when Iran will reengage in negotiations with the United States regarding a deal over its nuclear program. It is known that until 2003, both US intelligence forces and the IAEA concluded Iran was operating an organized nuclear weapons program. However, since then, Iran has been noted enriching uranium up to a 60% concentration, moving progressively closer to the weapons-grade level of 90%.
Despite the confrontational circumstances, the urgency for a diplomatic resolution remains high. Hope rests on negotiations with Iran that will address its nuclear program in a manner mutually acceptable to all concerned parties.
With the complexity and intricacy of the technical discussions likely to be held, these negotiations have a difficult road ahead. The violent exchange and volatile political conditions have further muddied the waters.
Although Iran’s cooperation with the IAEA has its challenges, experts hope to find a path forward that serves both national security and international cooperation. The recent conflict challenges these negotiations, raising questions as to how future cooperation can evolve in a context of deep-seated political tensions.
In the face of these complications, the international community watches with considerable interest and concern. The dialogue between Iran, the IAEA, and global powers will undoubtedly influence the future landscape of nuclear programs on the global stage.
The circumstances demand continued dialogue and the pursuit of peaceful resolutions. As the international community grapples with these recent events, the resilience of diplomatic norms and principles are being tested and will continue to shape the future of global nuclear politics.
The post Iran Halts Association with IAEA Following U.S. Bombing appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
