In response to the aerial bombardment of Iran’s essential nuclear locations by the United States, Iran’s leadership under President Masoud Pezeshkian decided to halt their collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on July 3. This decision took place against the backdrop of an escalating conflict with Israel, resulting in serious and simultaneous air strikes.
Moving forward, conversations between Iran and the IAEA are set to be multifaceted and technical in nature, as detailed by Iran’s Foreign Ministry. This will be the IAEA’s initial visit to Iran since the turbulence of severed ties with the organization that occurred last month, setting the scene for complex engagements.
Israeli forces, in conjunction with the United States, embarked on a 12-day air offensive against Iran in June, focusing their forces on important Iranian nuclear establishments. This marked a distinct low in the already faltering relationship between the IAEA and Iran, further complicating an already volatile geo-political situation.
The IAEA’s board confirmed a breach of non-proliferation obligations by Iran on June 12. This was closely followed by Israeli air strikes on Iran, escalating the situation into full-blown war. Worsening matters, the day following the IAEA’s declaration saw the initiation of air strikes by Israel, prompting further tension and eventual armed conflict.
The agency’s deputy leader will be making the crucial visit, although they are not scheduled to gain access to any Iranian nuclear sites during this journey. No immediate commentary or statements were offered from the IAEA’s end, adding fuel to the anticipation and conjectures surrounding the visit.
Esmail Baghaei, spokesperson for the Iranian Foreign Ministry, hinted towards the possibility of arranging a meeting with Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi. However, he noted that the proceedings of such technical and multifaceted talks are challenging to anticipate or predict in advance.
Baghaei expressed his dissatisfaction with the handling of the situation by the IAEA amid the air conflict with Israel in June. He lamented over the targeting of peaceful establishments under continuous surveillance, crediting the lack of a calculated response from the agency and the absence of appropriate condemnation for escalating the situation.
Further comments by Baghaei revealed that the intended cooperation between Iran and IAEA would necessitate the green light from Iran’s Supreme National Security Council. This cooperation aims to reconfigure the cooperation dynamics between the two entities, hence further complicating the situation.
Yet, this move may result in hindrances for inspectors who seek to monitor Tehran’s nuclear program. Up until recently, the nuclear program involved the enrichment of uranium close to the capacity that could be weaponized. This strongly emphasizes the implications of the latest political maneuvers on international security.
On July 3, as lethal air wars were launched by Israel and Iran underwent bombardment from the United States, President Masoud Pezeshkian decided again to suspend Iran’s involvement with the IAEA. Assaults on three of Iran’s core nuclear sites fueled the President’s decision and woefully resulted in nearly 1,100 casualties, including numerous high-ranking military officials.
Iran’s retaliation to the Israeli air strikes resulted in 28 Israeli fatalities. As far as International Nuclear Supervision is considered, the relationship between Iran and the IAEA has been strained and occasionally tension-laden in the past. Such tension was often employed as a strategy in the negotiation process with Western countries.
The future of the dialogue between Tehran and Washington D.C. regarding a nuclear deal remains uncertain. It is unclear how these discussions might unfold, considering the intensified political climate and the satiating repercussions of recent events.
As per previous assessments offered by the U.S. intelligence agencies and IAEA, Iran was last known to possess an organized nuclear weapons program in the year 2003. However, recent developments reveal that Tehran has been involved in uranium enrichment up to 60% capacity.
The aforementioned percentage indicates a nearing proximity to levels that can be weaponized (90%). Such advancement is merely a technical step away from reaching the dreaded weapons-grade threshold. The uncertainty surrounding these developments leaves the global community on edge, endeavoring to manage an increasingly challenging geopolitical landscape.
The post Iran Halts Collaboration with IAEA Amid US Aerial Bombardment appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
