As Irish peacekeepers patrol the southern regions of Lebanon today, negotiations are underway in New York to discuss their continued deployment. A vote recorded on this day will determine the destiny of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), an international peacekeeping initiative. This mission, inaugurated back in 1978, has witnessed innumerable losses through local conflicts and civil wars. Included in this count are 47 Irish peacekeepers who paid the ultimate sacrifice in support of peacekeeping operations.
The decision to extend UNIFIL’s mandate, under which over 9,500 military personnel from countries worldwide, including Irish troops, are positioned in Lebanon, is in the hands of the United Nations Security Council. This includes nations such as the United States, Britain, France, China, and Russia. These permanent members hold veto power, and much attention is focused on how the United States will cast their vote.
While it’s probable that the mandate will be extended following discussions initiated by France, it’s anticipated that the United States may utilize this voting opportunity to announce that this will be their final affirmative vote on such extension. This could potentially delay reaching a resolution on UNIFIL’s future. The American perspective is to permit the mandate’s renewal contingent upon its termination in August 2026, which would allow for the systematic withdrawal of troops.
Representatives from other member states serving in Lebanon, primarily driven by French diplomats and government officials, are expected to counteract the potential 2026 withdrawal with additional negotiations. This topic is poised to be the centerpiece of bilateral meetings between nations set to transpire in New York during the forthcoming week and weeks ahead.
The mission’s responsibilities of UNIFIL necessitate patrolling and maintaining a separation zone referred to as the Blue Line. Established after the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 2006, this line signifies a disputed withdrawal line rather than an international boundary. Serving as observers, the Irish and their global counterparts are tasked with responding to sporadic conflicts and unexpected incidents.
Despite a ceasefire agreement, Israel continues its airstrike operations against alleged Hezbollah fighters. Concurrently, there are reports from within Lebanon of another extremist group named Amal gathering momentum. Amidst a beleaguered governance in Beirut, Hezbollah is reputedly managing a almost parallel state in the south, providing healthcare services, amongst others.
Though there is generally some apprehension associated with voting for UNIFIL’s continuity, the favor typically tilts towards its extension. However, this year the scenario has been significantly different, affected by escalating conflicts throughout the Middle East, including Israel’s combat actions on Gaza and operations in Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. Americans have been aligning the stage for an eventual culmination of UNIFIL, given the close ties between the US and the Israeli government led by Benjamin Netanyahu.
A faction within Israel’s official circles desires the elimination of UNIFIL from southern Lebanon. Numerous well-informed pundits point to the motivation behind this stance to be enabling a more profound Israeli intrusion northwards with the intention of preventing rocket attacks on Israeli cities.
The explicit mandate for UNIFIL’s mission entails aiding the Lebanese army in guaranteeing the absence of militant groups in the southern territories. A mission that hasn’t been entirely successful, given the rise in Hezbollah activities observed across the region. Nevertheless, upon several trips to Lebanon, we’ve observed the UN mission positively influencing the lives of local inhabitants.
Both Israel and the United States maintain that UNIFIL hasn’t taken substantial strides to assist the Lebanese military in dismantling Hezbollah within their jurisdiction. More recently, the confrontation between Hezbollah and Israel escalated significantly after an invasion by Israel in October 2024.
In recent times, the US Ambassador to Turkey, appointed by President Trump, has been conducting meetings in both Lebanon and Israel. He visited previously to evaluate the effectiveness of the UNIFIL mission. The US, it is understood, has firmly communicated their expectation to the Lebanese government for a comprehensive disarmament of Hezbollah by the coming new year – a formidable undertaking indeed.
Many experts within the realm of security ascertain that Hezbollah’s capabilities surpass those of the Lebanese Armed Forces, notwithstanding the weakening of their strength due to incessant Israeli bombings. The lobbying by Israel for the permanent member, United States, to withhold their support for the UNIFIL mission continues to be extensive and unyielding behind the scenes.
International service contributes positively to career progression and experiences of military personnel, while at the same time improving their morale and motivation. Yet, the future of these undertakings, and indeed of UNIFIL, remains in the hands of the international political and negotiation scenes.
Overall, the future of UNIFIL seems to be hanging in the balance, compounded by increasing conflicts and political manoeuvring on the international stage. The decision over its extension will contribute significantly to shaping the political landscape of the Middle East.
The post Irish Peacekeepers in Lebanon: The Vote that Shapes Destiny appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
