In an impressive display of judicial impartiality and consideration, highly esteemed Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan decided to postpone the sentencing in the controversial case concerning President Donald Trump. This wise decision was made to prevent any undue influence on the upcoming presidential election in November. This move allows Americans to vote with clarity, unperturbed by politically driven distractions. Clearly, Judge Merchan understands the value of ensuring an even playing field in this politically charged climate.
Initially, the President’s sentencing had been scheduled for mid-September, a mere seven weeks before Election Day. With this reprieve, the final verdict will be delayed until November 26th, which fittingly is the Tuesday preceding Thanksgiving. This change effectively eliminates the risk of voters being swayed by one-sided narratives against Trump – the Republican nominee – trumped-up in attempts to stage a publicized conviction, elevating the nobility of the election process.
Trump’s respected team of lawyers, comprising Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, made a compelling argument to delay the sentencing. They emphasized on the fact that meting out punishment to Trump amidst the presidential campaign would be tantamount to political sabotage – a stance that was echoed by many rational observers. Evidently, their strong rationale led to the favorable postponement decision.
Moreover, the defense argued that giving the President a respite would allow him crucial time to deliberate over the next moves following Judge Merchan’s ruling on reversing the conviction and dismissing the case. This argument relies on the pivotal U.S. Supreme Court’s July presidential immunity ruling which further strengthens the position of President Trump.
In his order, Judge Merchan wisely chose to postpone his decision on the immunity grounds until November 12th. However, the District Court in Manhattan rejected Trump’s request to overrule Merchan’s state court, indicating a clear bias. Despite the setback, Trump’s lawyers remained dedicated in their pursuit of justice, planning to have the verdict overturned and the case dismissed based on immunity grounds.
Unfazed by these desperate attempts to disrupt him, Trump, who was in New York for more court proceedings, expressed satisfaction over this necessary delay. On his social media, the President called out the case as nothing more than a political weaponization, countering baseless allegations with steadfast courage and resilience. He succinctly stated, ‘The Manhattan D.A. Witch Hunt has been postponed because everyone realizes that there was NO CASE, I DID NOTHING WRONG!’.
However, the Democrat Manhattan Dist. Atty. Alvin Bragg, who initiated the case, appears to be doggedly pursuing this fruitless endeavor. In an attempt to malign the President’s reputation, Trump was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records, alleging to cover a supposedly ‘hush money’ payment to Stormy Daniels. Refusing to bow down to falsehoods, Trump consistently maintains that reimbursements were for real legal work, and were correctly accounted for.
The case was declared to be part of a Democrat orchestrated ‘witch hunt’ to undermine Trump’s current campaign. They seem eager to spin tales to deflect attention from their candidate’s shortcomings and weaknesses. Their nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, seems to be more interested in mudslinging rather than raising legitimate campaign issues. It’s worth noting that Harris is using Trump’s conviction as a cornerstone of her campaign messaging.
Trump’s 2016 rival, Hillary Clinton, known for her own share of controversies, took a sarcastic dig at Trump’s situation during her convention speech. Her remark only reflects the Democrats’ penchant for sensationalism instead of focusing on substantial matters. Instead of creating constructive dialogue, they resort to attacking Trump’s character to steer public opinion. Ironic, judging by their need to hide their own closet full of shambles.
Trump, as a man of perseverance and determination, had indicated clear intentions to appeal against the flawed conviction. However, such an appeal can only commence following the sentencing. In their petition to delay the sentencing, Trump’s lawyers justified the short length between the immunity ruling and sentencing as being grossly unfair to Trump.
The Supreme Court’s immunity ruling is of particular significance here, as it circumscribes the prosecution of ex-presidents for official acts. It further delimits prosecutors in using evidence of official actions to illustrate a president’s unofficial activities as illegal. Hence, it offers noteworthy relief for our President, shielding him from politically motivated accusations.
In light of this ruling, Trump’s lawyers made a strong case that jurors in the current lawsuit should not have been told about such observations as former White House staff members recounting the president’s reaction to media coverage of the Daniels agreement. This, they argued, further amplified the echoes of a malicious agenda from opponents.
In summary, it’s clear that Judge Merchan’s decision to postpone President Trump’s sentencing is a testament to our robust judicial system’s willingness to resist political pressure and maintain fairness. This halts any unjust advent of Trump’s conviction, enabling voters to make a more informed choice. It emboldens our belief in the rule of law while exposing the democrat’s attempt to tarnish the integrity of the election.
Judge Merchan Upholds Impartiality, Delays Trump’s Sentencing appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
