In July 2025, President Donald Trump found himself entangled in the intricate web of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Allegedly, United States Attorney General Pam Bondi claimed to have the elusive Epstein client list in her possession as of February 21. The significance of this list was underscored during a White House event on February 27, where a ‘Phase 1’ binder for its expected unveiling was shared. This anticipation, however, was met with a stark contrast on July 7, as the Department of Justice (DOJ) released a statement declaring the lack of any incriminating ‘client list.’
Following the DOJ’s insubstantial response on this high-stakes matter, petitions seeking genuine transparency started to gain traction. In an attempt to represent public sentiment, Republican House Representative Thomas Massie proposed the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Through this act, Massie strongly advocated for the release of the government’s complete files on the polarising Epstein case. He argued that citizens deserved clarity regarding the Epstein files, calling for accountability and insight into the extent of underlying corruption.
In typical fashion, President Trump responded to Massie’s legitimate concerns with disdain, unceremoniously branding him the ‘worst Republican Congressman.’ Notably, public figures who have traditionally displayed a pro-Trump stance, such as Marjorie Taylor Greene, Laura Loomer, Alex Jones, and Megyn Kelly, publicly took issue with Trump’s stance. MTG, true to her reputation as a staunch advocate for the truth, stood solidarity with Massie’s call for transparent justice.
On July 17, the case took a dramatic turn when a risque 2003 birthday note, believed to have been written by Trump, was located among Epstein’s personal documents. The DOJ, five days later, finally conceded that President Trump’s name does feature ‘multiple times’ in the federal evidence. Yet, they adamantly insisted that there weren’t ‘any more Epstein files’ left for the public eye. This was a deeply mistrusted claim, adding fuel to the already wildfire-scale public suspicion.
Rather than pacifying his base, Trump further pushed boundaries by diverting focus towards Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s alleged partner-in-crime. He bewilderingly suggested the possibility of pardoning her, stating that he was ‘allowed to’ do so, in the face that ‘nobody’s asked’ him about it yet. This response set forth a flurry of legal threats and countersuits, turning Trump’s controversy into a swirling fog of questionable actions and accusations.
In the eye of this raging storm, Trump took an unexpected leap by lodging a massive $10 billion complaint in federal court. His lawyers promptly demanded the deposition of Murdoch within a fortnight. Trump’s outrage was directed towards a publication that purportedly ‘fabricated’ the damning birthday note and framed him as being in cahoots with Epstein, in their relentless pursuit to tarnish his reputation.
However, this was not the end of Trump’s legal onslaught. He also pointed the finger at former President Barack Obama, accusing him of having conveniently ‘buried’ evidence linking Bill Clinton to Epstein. Equally troubling were the accusations of Obama having orchestrated the initial Russia probe as a vindictive move.
Trump’s accusatory spotlight next pivoted towards Kamala Harris, whom he blamed for running a campaign allegedly ‘funded by illegal celebrity payments.’ The severity escalated with Trump suggesting that the Department of Justice should indict Harris on the grounds of ‘wire fraud.’ It’s perplexing to consider that Trump’s legal actions only seemed to further cloud the overall issue, drawing attention away from the actual need for transparency on the Epstein files.
His tirade did not stop there. Trump targeted popular singer, Beyoncé, claiming that she was paid for a mere ‘endorsement.’ He then made a call for well-esteemed networks, ABC and NBC, to lose their licenses, given what he perceived to be their roles as ‘political pawns for the Democratic Party.’ His claims were as audacious as they were unfounded.
While this strategy ensured the media remained fixated on Trump’s retaliations, the fact remained that these deflections might very well have been obscuring the real issues at hand — the anticipated pardon, and potential continuance of withholding the actual Epstein files. The implications of this possible smokescreen strategy raised critical questions among the electorate.
Could the president’s indiscriminate legal attacks recover the trust of his disenchanted voters? Or would these baseless accusations simply continue to headline news stories, while perpetuating the Epstein discussion in the background? Regardless of these possibilities, the future remained uncertain.
In the end, one thing seemed to be inevitable – the list of defendants was continuously expanding. With each passing day, the narrative unveiled fresh aspects that only seemed to embed the Epstein case more profoundly into the public consciousness. As things stood, there seemed neither an end in sight for the controversy, nor its spectrum of ever-increasing complexities.
The post Kamala Harris Accused of Running Illegal Celebrity-Funded Campaign appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
