William Henry Harrison, the ninth U.S. President, left multiple records in his wake, but it’s his unprecedented swing from election loss to victory that turns a lens towards Kamala Harris in contemporary politics. Harrison was the last president to lose an initial election, only to scoop up the victory in the following race. This victory streak was a feat not seen again, not even by the likes of Richard Nixon, who found victory after significant delay. The winning, losing and then winning again cycle was an exclusive for Grover Cleveland and Donald Trump. Certainly, those who made the audacious move of running immediately after a loss met with repeated failure; cue Democrat Adlai Stevenson and Republican Thomas Dewey.
Historical patterns suggest that voters have a distaste for backing political losers. It’s not a comforting revelation, especially for Kamala Harris, whose steps away from the California governor’s race last week fueled speculation of another White House bid. Yet, the uphill battle that lies ahead for Harris is more than just about personal redemption – it’s a reflection of the Democratic Party’s record-breaking unpopularity. The overwhelming negative favorability, reaching -30 points, triples the GOP’s deficit and marks the party’s worst popularity downturn in the last three-and-a-half decades.
What’s the root of the Democrats’ dire situation? A dissatisfied base of supporters; from leftists to centrists, the Democratic Party’s actions have sparked a wave of frustration. Progressive supporters lament the party’s lack of aggressive pushback against opposition, while centrists disapprove of the party’s extreme swing towards the left, characterized by an overemphasis on cultural and identity politics. The common denominator linking these factions is a yearning for victories, a necessity which, unfortunately for Harris, continues to elude her.
Harris’ ambitions to become the 2024 Democratic nominee were largely influenced by her strategic positioning as a diversity candidate. There was a clear indication by Joe Biden that his Vice Presidential pick would be a woman and specifically, an African American. However, Harris’ stumbling block lies not in her gender or racial identity but rather in her inability to create a compelling narrative that broadens the Democratic party’s appeal. It’s not just about getting out the Democratic vote, but about winning over the ever-elusive Trump supporters.
Beneath the layers of political maneuvering, Harris’ struggle reflects a transformation in the modern electorate. The traditional appeal tactics are failing – her rhetoric, reminiscent of a liberal arts college dean, lacked the authenticity that today’s voters are seeking. The approach of crafting her convictions in response to focus group results, a strategy which glaringly shows except for issues like reproductive rights, was a far cry from the originality and genuineness that voters of the present-day desire.
Harris succumbed to Joe Biden’s request to align herself fully with him, an absolute blunder considering Biden’s questionable leadership. Her decision to make ‘The Late Show’ with Stephen Colbert the platform for her first post-office interview provided insight into her strategy, or rather, the lack thereof. Appealing only to an audience that is already committed to their ideology makes it nearly impossible for Harris to extend the envelope of Democratic support.
The Democrats’ route to victory requires capturing an audience beyond their niche, a task Harris proved incapable of accomplishing. Persistent reliance on ideologically committed audiences is not what the party needs to pull a win. Unsurprisingly, if Democrats choose to put their weight behind Harris once more, it’s likely she will become a trivia question staple rather than making the history she dreams of. Picturing Harris as the 48th President of the US seems an increasingly unlikely scenario.
Perhaps the tale of Harris’ political journey serves as a perfect illustration of the wider issues plaguing the Democratic Party. A lack of adaptive strategy, combined with an ineffective leadership, the Democrats seem to be heading towards an identity crisis. Fixated on cultural battles and identity politics, the party seems unable to meet the demands of a quickly evolving electorate. For an entity that once stood as a strong opposition, the picture seems bleak.
An additional layer of this issue is the overreliance on diversity as a selling point for candidacy. While diversity is indeed an important asset, the Democrats’ fixation on it as a means to gain electoral support may be misguided. The aim should be to strike a balance, combining a diverse representation with effective policies and leadership – an equation the Democrats, seen through the predicament of Kamala Harris, have failed to decipher.
The increasing disconnect between the Democratic Party and its voters paints a daunting picture. Party favorability is at an all-time low, and infighting among the progressive and centrist wings continues to exacerbate the divide. Instead of focusing on how to appeal to different interests within the party, leaders like Harris are distracted by token politics.
With her eyes possibly set on another presidential run, Kamala Harris needs to take a serious look at the reasons behind her previous failures. Her one-dimensional appeal to specific voter demographic groups proved futile in attempting to resonate with the complex, multifaceted electorate that we see today. Insincere convictions, simply tailored to appease focus groups, are unlikely to be effective in these voting blocs that seek genuine representation.
The post Kamala Harris: Destined to Make History, or Trivia? appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
