Former Governor Kristi Noem, who is currently serving as Secretary of Homeland Security under the Trump administration, has been exposed for her excessive travel expenses which have been burdening the state of South Dakota. These expenses were kept under wraps during her time as Governor; however, analysis of recently published travel records has incited a wave of criticism for the staggering bills taxpayers have shouldered that are linked to Noem’s personal and political activities, amounting to more than $150,000. These cost expenditures do not align with the ethos of state business but appear to be manipulative exploits of the lax travel expense disclosure requirements in South Dakota.
Specially, citizens were disproportionately burdened with costs for her frequent forays to Palm Beach, Florida. Expenses for state-supplied security, which Noem required irrespective of the reason for her visits, formed a significant part of the accumulated sum. Over a period of six years during her tenure as Governor, South Dakota, unwittingly covered over $640,000 in travel-related costs orchestrated by the Governor’s office.
Among these excessive expenses are bills from a trip to Paris where Noem spoke at an ultra-conservative gathering, and a book tour cost which included expenses for touring the East Coast and stopping in New York. Paradoxically, these spending patterns emerge as the Trump administration, of which Noem is now a part, is preaching about the elimination of waste, fraud, and corruption in government agencies. One might perceive an unsettling irony in this situation as Noem currently presides over the third-largest agency in Federal America, the Department of Homeland Security.
The former Governor’s indiscriminate spending sparked outrage among her predecessors. Dennis Daugaard, a previous Republican governor of South Dakota, forthrightly shares that these acts offend a multitude of people. A spokesman for Noem, dodging detailed queries about the expenses, did not contest that a portion of the travel bore no correlation to state activities. However, there is no evidence to suggest that Noem violated any laws by allowing the state to cover the security expenses.
Throughout her years in office, Noem defended her opaque expense management by alleging that the disclosure of travel expenses could put her safety at risk. South Dakota’s relaxed requirements for travel expense disclosure may have made her justification plausible. Yet, it should be noted that governors from both sides of the aisle have used state resources to finance their security teams’ travel expenses and those of their cabinets.
More than 3,000 pages of released records reveal seemingly unrelated state business expenditures such as restaurant bills, hotel, receipts, and movie purchases in hotel rooms. The State Auditor expressed concern over specific charges, such as the luxury travel agency used by the Governor’s office for booking a flight to Paris and a substantial $2,000 change fee, a cost that seems gratuitously wasteful.
Additionally, more than $3,300 in overdue fees and interest charges have surfaced, adding salt to the wounds of South Dakota taxpayers. Yet, the published records do not show how much was shelled out in staff and security overtime when these individuals had to accompany Noem on these indulgent journeys.
All the while, Noem sprang to the national stage in Trump’s ‘Make America Great Again’ campaign. Her office, however, refused to disclose records related to a speech she made at a Trump supporters’ gathering near Miami. Despite this reluctance, the released records divulged several transactions in South Florida during that period, including expenses for a rental car and deluxe accommodations at a prime Miami hotel.
Days following the Miami event, the state bore the brunt of more expenses as Noem then attended a Republican fundraiser in New Hampshire. Her security team’s gasoline and hotel costs were again unscrupulously passed onto the taxpayers of South Dakota. These instances of questionable spending suggest a blurred line between the Governor’s responsibilities and her political ambitions.
Viki Harrison, a program director for a nonpartisan group, asserts that Noem’s extravagant travel expenses fail to pass the public scrutiny test and that there should be an impregnable wall separating official duties from campaigning. A blatant disregard of such ethical boundaries, as seen in Noem’s actions, can breed disillusionment among taxpayers who decisively look to their leaders for upstanding conduct and unbiased use of public funds.
Noem’s predecessors, who exercised frugality due to South Dakota’s low-tax ecosystem, traveled less and prioritized the responsible use of state resources. Observing a firm divide between partisan activities and state resources, former Governor Mike Rounds managed to keep partisanship at ‘arm’s length.’ Now a junior U.S. senator, Rounds opines that he was careful about what he charged to the government’s account, thereby setting an example noticeably contrasting with Noem’s behavior.
To encapsulate, the recently unveiled episodes of extravagant spending under former Governor Kristi Noem’s tenure cast a shadow over the sincerity of Noem’s commitment to public service. As she continues to serve as the Secretary of Homeland Security under the Trump administration, questions might loom large about her financial discretion and stewardship of taxpayers’ resources.
The post Kristi Noem’s Extravagant Travel Costs: Drain on South Dakota Taxpayers appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
