At the beginning of a new parliamentary session after the May 3 elections, the Albanese Labor administration has proposed bills to formally cement and broaden the mandatory interrogation authority of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), the country’s internal political intelligence agency. The public was caught off guard by this move, which was not only unexpected but also not part of the election discourse. In addition, the media has largely neglected to cover the two legislative proposals brought forth by Tony Burke, Minister of Home Affairs. Consequently, the majority of the populace remains uninformed about these significant changes, with intent to keep them as uninformed as possible about this dramatic shift.
ASIO was first granted the power to compulsorily question individuals in 2003, in the context of the professed ‘war on terrorism.’ Now, the Labor party’s proposed amendments to the ASIO Act look to further enlarge and indefinitely extend these powers. The first of these proposals aims to eliminate a ‘sunset’ clause which was originally intended to limit these powers past September 7. The secondary legislation, on the other hand, seeks not only to eradically remove such ‘sunset’ limitations, but also to expand the purview of these powers.
Under the proposed legislation, four additional war-related areas will fall under ASIO’s purview. The amendment will empower ASIO to secretively and coercively question individuals, including those as young as 14, for durations of up to 24 hours, which may be extended with breaks. Citizens could be asked to provide ‘information’, inclusive of alleged materials and documents pertaining to four new areas: sabotage; encouragement of communal violence; attacks on defense facilities; and threats to border security.
In 2020, the Morrison Liberal-National Coalition government expanded ASIO’s questioning powers on ‘terrorism’ to include three additional areas, namely espionage, foreign meddling, and politically-motivated violence, with Labor’s backing. The proposed amendment has the potential to cover any political activity that the government or ASIO might label as ‘extremist’ or associated with a ‘foreign’ or international organisation.
The existing ASIO Act allows for the agency to easily gain warrants, even verbally, from the attorney-general, enabling questioning of a person to gather ‘information’ that would ‘significantly assist the collection of intelligence.’ It is not required to place charges or even make allegations of a criminal act. Failure to cooperate, divulge materials, or providing untruthful information could land a person in prison for up to five years.
A unique condition of these interrogations is the legislation’s imposition of silence, punishable by five years in prison, if those under question disclose their experience to anyone other than an ASIO-approved lawyer for a period of two years following the questioning. This secrecy functions to shield ASIO’s operations from public scrutiny.
ASIO’s ever-widening authority presents a stark resemblance to that of a police state. These extensive powers trample over fundamental democratic freedoms such as the right to refuse to answer, the right against self-incrimination, and the core principle of no detention without charges or trial. These powers, which initially seemed ‘extraordinary’ and intended to be temporary, were ushered in to counter terrorism after the tragically unexplained Al Qaeda-related events of 9/11 and the subsequent US-led invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.
While tabling the amendments, Burke reiterated ASIO’s ‘essential role in protecting Australia and Australians from threats to their security.’ He justified these compulsory questioning powers, terming them a ‘unique and necessary tool’ to investigate Australia’s most pressing threats. However, since its inception by the Chifley Labor government in 1949, ASIO’s records show a myriad of politically-motivated investigations and injustices, particularly targeting socialist and left-wing entities.
The Labor government’s current focus also includes budgeting huge amounts for military expenditures, including funds for AUKUS submarines, other armaments, and enhancements of bases across northern Australia for extended US accessibility. In response to the Trump administration’s demands for heftier investment, pledges are being made to further increase spending.
Burke contends that ‘ASIO has utilised these powers judiciously,’ deeming them a ‘valuable tool for collecting intelligence.’ According to the official records, ASIO exercised this power a mere four times since being bestowed these rights in 2002. However, no information regarding these instances has been made publicly available.
Labor proposes for the second bill to undergo refinement by the parliament’s joint intelligence and security committee, whose members are all accepted by, and are from, the Labor or Coalition party. It’s noticeable that this committee is largely confidential, and all members are vetted by ASIO.
The Greens have voiced initial concerns about the bill but suggest referring the bill to the Senate’s legal and constitutional committee, where they hold participation. Interestingly, when the Greens’ representative, Senator David Shoebridge, tabled a motion to this effect, it was resoundingly defeated 36 to 12, with votes from Labor, Coalition, and far-right senators.
The Labor government’s deliberate progression to broaden ASIO’s rigorous powers serves to highlight the preparations being made to establish a political landscape shaped by suppression and censorship almost reminiscent of warlike conditions. This is particularly alarming as the government, despite an widespread anti-war sentiment, continues to commit to a feasible catastrophic conflict with China over dominance in the Indo-Pacific region and globally.
Seemingly, these legislative proposals display a bleak image of an Australia moving away from its democratic principles, as the lines between surveillance for security and suppression of opposition become blurred. Labor’s readiness and urgency to establish these laws show an increased focus on internal security perhaps indicative of broader geopolitical threats.
Despite the limited space for public debate and media coverage, a potential intensification of ASIO’s powers raises fundamental questions about individual rights and personal freedoms within democratic societies. The Australia-wide implications of such empowered state-led surveillance deserve careful scrutiny and open public dialogue.
In conclusion, the Albanese Labor government’s attempt to expand ASIO’s powers is an alarming indication of a potential shift towards an increased state control, using the guise of national security. Thus, these changes demand careful monitoring to ensure the preservation of Australia’s democratic ideals amidst these trying times.
The post Labor Proposes Expansion of ASIO’s Powers: A Shift Towards Surveillance State? appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
