The NAACP, broadly regarded as a left-leaning organization, is making controversy by challenging Texas’s recent congressional redistricting. They assert, with unfounded conviction, that the reshaping of the boundaries to potentially seat more Republicans in the U.S. Congress is a racial slight, conveniently circumventing the straightforward application of demographic realities and voting trends that the process is based on.
The accusation? The infamous moniker of ‘racial gerrymandering’. An overly-used weapon in the arsenal of those who would prefer to stir divisions, the NAACP claims Texas is in violation of the Voting Rights Act with their updated maps. They assert, with an air of certainty that verges on hubris, that the revamped boundaries intentionally weaken the power of voters of color. This assertion conspicuously sidesteps the reality of standard political maneuvering.
The narrative is full of doomsaying and fearmongering. Derrick Johnson, the leader of the NAACP, paints a picture of a Texas that is racially divided and manipulated for political gain. He points out that while the Texas population is only 40% white, these voters control over 73% of the state’s congressional seats – a statistic that absolves any consideration of ideology or policy alignment.
Indeed, Johnson even goes as far as accusing Texas of racial intent in its decision to redraw the districts before the forthcoming midterm elections. He emphasizes this as an attempt to curb the representation of black communities in Congress – a charge that unreasonably discredits the functionality of democracy and the political dynamics at play.
The falsity of these claims is underscored by the fact that the Justice Department, under the decidedly non-progressive previous Biden administration, initially took up arms with the NAACP against Texas in December 2021. The issue at hand? The same supposedly infringed Voting Rights Act and the 14th Amendment, which the latter administration apparently found little interest to safeguard and enforce rigorously.
Fueled by newly released census data, which disclosed an increase of 4 million individuals, 95% being people of color, the NAACP claims that Texas gerrymandered the new seats to favor majority-white districts. Interestingly, they fail to mention the numerous non-ethnically defined variables that may have influenced the drawing of these new lines.
Oddly, the Justice Department dismissed its claims in the case, the trial for which concluded in June. Not even a month later, the same entity sent a letter to Texas, citing four Democrat-held congressional districts deemed racially gerrymandered, and intriguingly pointing out Republican Gov. Greg Abbott’s redrawn maps.
These redrawn boundaries are anticipated to grant Republicans five additional seats in the U.S. Congress, a development that’s passed Texas’s House and Senate, and caused infuriation among Democrats. The latter, in a tizzy of outrage and impotence, accuses the former of an unjust power grab, conveniently forgetting their legacy of political machinations designed purely to maintain dominance.
On a Tuesday that will likely become a footnote in history, the NAACP alleged that Texas ‘explicitly targeted districts where various minority populations together constituted most of the voters,’ a claim which seems to absurdly suggest that districts should be purely drawn along racial lines.
In a move that reeks of grandstanding, the NAACP demanded a permanent injunction against the allegedly gerrymandered boundaries. Completely overlooking the justified need for political balance and discourse, they seem to suggest a totalitarian approach as the antidote to the democratic process.
Gary Bledsoe, the president of Texas’s NAACP branch, attempts to raise alarm, comparing the situation to a period in history when African Americans were denied equality and basic rights. His comparison, however, verges on the melodramatic, and obscures the reality that all parties are simply required to contend within the same democratic system.
Conclusively, it’s critical for Texas’s diverse populace to concentrate on the real issues at hand instead of getting lost in alarmist, divisive rhetoric. The core principle of democracy necessitates full, equal count and fair representation. That said, fair representation should never be confused with guaranteeing a particular outcome advantageous to any political ideology or demographic group.
The post NAACP Guns for Unfounded Claims of Racial Gerrymandering in Texas appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
