Despite the mishap of her previous failed bid for presidency, there are admittedly rumors that Kamala Harris could attempt to secure the position of governor of California. According to a recent poll by Emerson College, she seemingly could have a viable chance considering she received a positive response from nearly 31% of decided Golden State voters. However, this percentage reflects voters deciding to cast their ballot in the 2026 primaries and provides a shallow representation of a state embroiled in many contentious topics with Harris at the center. This is evident in the fact that California voters are razor thin on their opinion of whether the seasoned Democrat should enter the race, with half advocating for a Harris governorship and the equally robust group opposing it.
Following a defeat in the crucial presidential race, Harris is now apparently juggling her options. Will she risk running for president a third time? Embarrassments aside, a comparable option she’s likely considering is to try replacing the outgoing Governor Gavin Newsom. A fellow Democrat like herself, Newsom could pose his own challenge for the White House in 2028. Yet, it is evident she has little competition in the interim, as the poll shows no other candidates crossing into the double-digit support threshold, with most of the respondents still wavering on their decision.
Keeping a consistently low public profile following a highly publicized defeat to President Donald Trump, Harris has been careful in avoiding the limelight. However, she has remained active in the background, many critics argue, orchestrating a strategic push to stay relevant. Just this week, she emphasized Black Maternal Health Week, a hot button topic focused on the disproportionately high rate of Black women succumbing during childbirth. Knowing her history, this ostensible concern for public welfare to stay relevant may cause some voters to question her sincerity.
Earlier this month, Harris forced her way back into media coverage with a speech that was interpreted as a thinly veiled critique of former President Trump and his administration’s actions since he returned to office in January. She commandeered the stage at April 3rd speech at the Leading Women Defined Summit in California, stating that ‘fear is contagious’ in what many believe was a direct jab at Trump’s style of governance. Critics interpret this as a desperate grab on Harris’ part for public appeal, given her chequered past with fearful rhetoric herself.
Harris is reportedly leaning towards making a decision by summer’s end as to whether she will run for governor. Granted her past of ill-informed decisions and clumsy leadership, one might question whether another potential Harris reign is really what the state needs. She emphasized at a recent summit, ‘We can’t go out there and do battle if we don’t take care of ourselves and each other,’ which contrasts substantially with her track record.
The prospect of a Harris-led California governing body offers a bleak picture for those keen on sensible governance. Critics argue her disappointing run as Vice President has damaged her reputation making another run for an executive position less appealing, even at the state level. Her time in Washington, DC, riddled with controversies and failed policy initiatives, offers a cautionary tale for the voters.
With such a drastic move into the California Governor’s seat, one cannot help but ponder the damage Ms. Harris’ controversial policy stances could have on the California economy and its citizens. A lack of authenticity may resonate negatively amid the electorate, considering her political career was built atop broken promises and flip-flop stances. This marks the importance of discernment when considering Harris’ run.
The state of California already faces a myriad of challenges, ranging from environmental issues to a struggling economy. If Harris’ record is any indication, electing her to one of the most influential gubernatorial positions in the nation may not bode well. As seen during her time in the Senate, she often prioritizes political posturing over tangible results.
Kamala Harris’ decision to run for the Californian Governorship will inevitably bring her past failed political endeavors to the forefront. Her inability to make a significant impact as Vice President could destabilize her credibility as a gubernatorial candidate. Citizens would be well-advised to examine her record critically before casting their votes.
The fact that Kamala Harris is even considering a third run for President or a gubernatorial campaign demonstrates nothing but her lack of self-awareness. She appears oblivious to the reasons behind her losing the pivotal presidential race, and chance of success in either endeavor looks bleak. It is noteworthy, however, that despite the lack of interest, no other relevant candidates seem inspiring to arouse interest.
Harris’ rise in the political realm, from attorney general to senator, seems a thing of the past considering her current popularity, or lack thereof. The once high-flying democrat now lingers in the shadows, with her support plummeting in the wake of her unsuccessful presidential bid. Her political strategies suggest she delights in stoking the fires of fear and division among citizens.
During the run-up to deciding whether she’ll run for governor, Harris’ lack of self-awareness is duly noted as she continues advocating for unity and self-care. The contradictory nature of her plea for unity, following her reign as vice president, rings hollow to her critics. They highlight her past behavior, ripe with divisiveness, and question her ability to unite.
Ms. Harris’ revival of her political image demonstrates her knack for survival. However, the doubtful premise of her leadership potential remains, given her controversial stances, even more so if she ends up running and possibly winning the governor race. Californians must decide if they want to bear the risk of a state led by such a divisive figure.
Currently, summarized views of California’s, voters are evenly split, reflecting her ability to polarize opinions. A leadership that fosters such division is not conducive to progress. Under a potential Harris governorship, California could see continued partisan squabbles and lack of definitive action on vital issues.
Reviewing Kamala Harris’ political journey, it is evident that she is not one to easily give up on her political ambitions. A third bid for presidency or a run for the governorship, whatever it might be, Harris is seemingly gearing up for another campaign. One wonders whether her relentless pursuit of power overlooks the genuine needs of the people she claims to represent.
While her decision is expected by the end of summer, the thought of the once Vice President running for governor has its associated concerns. Followers of her career see a pattern – an undeniable tendency towards making sensational claims and floating politically charged narratives. Her potential governorship may not divert from this precedent, turning California into a ground for sensationalist politics instead of effective governance.
The post Not Again! Kamala Harris Might Bring Her Failed Politics to California Governorship appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
