Residents of Chicago brace yourselves. A military deployment within the city, possibly involving several thousands of National Guardsmen, has been under consideration at the Pentagon for some time, according to sources privy to the discussions. This is in response to President Donald Trump’s intention to curb urban crime, tackle homelessness, and address undocumented immigration. The Chicago model, if successful, could serve as a blueprint for deployments in other large, urban areas.
Pending approval, this deployment would align with a debatable and legally contested strategy enforced by Trump in June in Los Angeles. Here, despite opposition from local and state authorities, a sizable contingent of 4,000 California National Guard members and 700 active-duty Marines were stationed. Currently, the utilization of active-duty servicemen in Chicago is under discussion, however, this is viewed as a less likely scenario.
Turning our gaze to the nation’s capital, Washington D.C., we can currently find in excess of 2,200 National Guardsmen deployed. Their assignment? To combat the rise in grave criminal activity that has beset the district, notably the upswing in carjackings.
However, the charges brought before federal courts following the president’s assumed control over the city’s law enforcement depict a new interpretation of law enforcement. Defendants hauled before a federal courtroom during a recent session were answering to charges that are more routinely handled at a local level, many times not brought forward at all. One such case was the arrest of a man over an open alcohol container.
In another incident, post his arrest on a vandalism charge, a man was indicted for threatening the president – a charge stemming from an alcohol-fuelled outburst. These instances lead to pertinent questions. Are these measures an appropriate use of the authorities in question? And, are these low-level enforcement actions bound to result in legal controversy worth the effort?
In a pivotal update on the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia: He is a resident of Maryland of Salvadoran origin who found himself mistakenly deported by the Trump Administration earlier this year – a move in direct violation of a judicial order. Since being returned to U.S. soil, Abrego Garcia has been held on accusations of human smuggling.
Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty to these charges and appealed to the court to throw out the case. According to him, the charges served to penalize him for objecting to his unlawful deportation to El Salvador. Now, there’s a twist in the tale. Immigration authorities have proposed to deport him, rather inexplicably, to Uganda.
In a surprising turn of events, the government extended an offer to Abrego. He was told on Friday night that he could plea for a deportation to Costa Rica by Monday morning. But the offer had a catch; if he leaves it till the last minute, the opportunity would not be open for him again.
Abrego Garcia had an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) attendance this morning as per his parole conditions. However, he finds himself taken into custody by ICE once again. His choices are all equally unappealing: acquiesce to the Costa Rica deal, surrender to the Uganda idea, or engage his lawyers to contest the Uganda proposal. Each route requires him to part ways with his family who reside in Maryland.
Recent developments show that an understanding has been reached with Uganda last week. The east African country has agreed to accept American deportees, provided they don’t have a criminal past and are not unaccompanied minors.
Reflecting this development, President Donald Trump indicated that criminals needing to be deported would be sent to South Sudan or Eswatini, formerly Swaziland. For now, neither of these agreements appears to have been formalized.
The post Potential Military Deployment in Chicago: A Strategy to Curb Urban Crime? appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
