Equity markets saw notable dips on Monday as financial stakeholders evaluated the potential impact of a vague statement from President Trump indicating his intention to enact a 100% tariff on all foreign-shot movies. Stock values for top-tier entertainment ventures such as Disney, Netflix, Warner Bros. Discovery, and Paramount Global demonstrated visible signs of this new market uncertainty. Netflix, for example, succumbed to a 3.3% reduction, Disney saw a 2.4% decrease and the impact was even greater for Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Global which trailed with decreases of 4.2% and 2.2% respectively.
With the opening bell of the U.S. trading session, the industry was off to a challenging start. Particularly impacted was Lionsgate Studios, witnessing a somewhat concerning 7% decline at the beginning of the day’s trading. This downtrend was not isolated to the entertainment companies, however, the downward graph was quite pronounced compared to broader market indexes such as the S&P 500 which fell 0.70% while the Nasdaq Composite experienced a 0.82% slash.
As trading continued into the day, a cautious recovery could be seen with Hollywood listed stocks regaining some footing, although many remained lodged in the red terrain. Lionsgate Studios emerged as the hardest hit of the day, with their tumble finally stabilizing at a loss of 5.4%. Other industry heavyweights such as Netflix, Paramount, Warner Bros. Discovery, and Disney were also in the red, though their losses hovered between a more modest range of 0.1% to 2.12%.
Comcast, the media conglomerate presiding over Universal Pictures through its subsidiary NBCUniversal, managed to tread water during this turbulence, with its stock lying essentially flat at an increase of 0.03%. On Sunday, President Trump forwarded the argument on his social media network, Truth Social, that these foreign lands enticing American filmmakers and studios to offshore their productions are striking at the heart of U.S. National Security.
In his post on Truth Social, the president accused certain nations of initiating a coordinated plot to attract American filmmakers away from the home ground – a scheme he identified as posing a national security threat. As a countermove, he declared his intentions to direct the U.S. Trade Representative and the Commerce Department to institute a 100% tariff on all movies entering the U.S. that were produced outside its borders.
The White House further amplified on the president’s stance with a statement on Monday morning from Spokesperson Kush Desai. Though final decisions regarding the imposition of movie tariffs were not yet confirmed, Desai stated that the administration was seriously considering all potential paths. The goal was to ensure the fulfillment of President Trump’s directive to secure both the nation’s economic and national security.
This marked a significant departure from Hollywood’s expectation at the start of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs scheme introduced in early April. Analysts had previously predicted that the policy, given its historical application to tangible goods rather than intellectual property, would have a negligible impact on Hollywood. However, an expansion of global trade war to cover the movie industry, as indicated by the President’s recent statements, seems to be in the offing.
The administration’s proposal has raised a host of unanswered queries and speculative scenarios regarding its execution and enforcement. How the tariffs will affect projects currently in progress — such as Paramount Pictures’ ‘Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning’, primarily shot in the U.K. and scheduled for a May 23 release — remains uncertain.
Deeper questions arise when considering the more complex, globally scattered production processes. Filmmaking typically involves several stages carried out across a variety of countries, including scriptwriting, shooting, editing, post-processing, and visual effects. The U.K., France, Germany, Hungary, and Canada are among the most frequently featuring nations in these global production chains.
In these fluid situations, marking the national identity of a movie becomes quite challenging. Currently, there’s no available information on how the Trump administration plans to pinpoint what constitutes a ‘foreign-produced’ movie. There are even queries about whether the levies would also extend to television production.
‘Netflix, the studio that currently leads in producing the highest number of films, could be heavily impacted. Analysts have projected that, by 2024, movies will generate between 25% to 30% of the total viewership on the Netflix platform’, says Swinburne. However, he also points out that each movie may involve aspects of writing, production, editing, and post-production scattered across multiple countries, complicating the tariff imposition.
A further risk arises from potential retaliatory tariffs. If the U.S. starts taxing foreign films, international governments might respond by introducing their own levies on U.S streaming services or film releases. This could pose a substantial risk to the American movie industry which is significantly dependent on global markets.
The import of the proposed tariff imposition is further emphasized when considering the considerable economic contribution of the U.S. movie industry. The Motion Picture Association reports that, as of 2023, the sector generated $22.6 billion via exports, raking in an overall trade surplus of $15.3 billion.
The movie industry has not only been a key contributor to the US economy but has also thrived in overseas markets. Hollywood has managed to balance its trade books positively with every significant overseas market. This salient fact underscores the severity of the potential impact that tariffs on foreign films could have on the industry.
As speculation continues to swirl around the future of foreign film tariffs, Hollywood and the greater global film industry look towards an uncertain horizon. This ambiguity has roused multiple stakeholder concerns, linking the future viability of many cross-border multimedia projects to the unpredictable tattoo of the financial markets.
Only time will tell how this situation will evolve and what impact the looming tariffs will have on Hollywood and the global movie industry. Until President Trump’s aim of a 100% tariff on foreign-produced films becomes a confirmed policy with clear definitions and enforcement mechanisms, the industry sprawls within a clouded landscape filled with unpredictability and unanswered questions.
The post President Trump’s Tariff Threat Shakes Hollywood appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
