In an turn of events, Zohran Mamdani, the Democrat vying for the mayoral seat of New York City, wishes to become a formidable socialist figure. Though, American socialists like him face an uphill battle; the greatest socialist leadership position is currently occupied by mayors in California and a county executive in Maryland.
The Democratic Socialists of America, with Mamdani as an active member, seems to hold their heads in the clouds, planning to put forth a socialist candidate for the 2028 Presidential election. This indicates the unrealistic visions of today’s socialists, reinforced by Mamdani’s naiveté, which was evidenced in his New York primary campaign.
Notably, the narrative around his campaign relied heavily on the allure of a strong socialist economic message. It’s baffling that such an ideology could drum up significant voter enthusiasm, echoing an alarming trend: recent poll figures suggest that 67 percent of Democrats and 62 percent of those under 30 years old in America view socialism in a positive light.
Boasting a sizeable member base of 85,000, the DSA is the largest left-leaning organization in America, with a presence dwarfing that of the Communist Party at its peak in the 1940s. However, despite these seemingly impressive numbers, the DSA significantly lacks political power within the 340-million population of the United States.
The Democratic Socialists of America has embarrassingly limited representation in government. With only three of its members in Congress and absolutely no presence in the Senate, the DSA, even a decade post Bernie Sanders’s iconic presidential run, struggles to distinguish itself as a political force. American socialists, therefore, exist as an ambiguous entity.
Strikingly, the ideals of DSA’s founder, Michael Harrington, starkly contrast with the majority of today’s DSA members. Harrington, a Marxist who passed away in 1989, was an advocate for global socialist unity but also a strong opponent of authoritarianism.
The Socialist Party of America, which saw its fall a decade earlier, was Harrington’s starting point for founding the DSA in 1982. However, despite adopting certain elements of the youth-driven New Left movement of the 1960s, this new party—the DSA—only managed to secure a minor political role over several decades.
The real break came in 2016, when Bernie Sanders chose to participate in the Democratic Party primary, not as a result of a fanciful third-party campaign by the socialists. Today, despite housing around two dozen internal factions (termed ‘caucuses’), the majority of DSA’s politics can be broken down into two categories.
One reflects a mass-politics approach, attempting to secure socialist victories through the Democratic platform and striving for a national socialist organization mainstream enough to resonate with the American public – a clear example of misguided optimism.
Conversely, there’s a sect within the DSA that maintains more extreme political leanings, disconnected from any genuine essence of democratic socialism – an evident symptom of a profound need for self-reflection within the organization.
Notably, these two fundamental differences are not merely theoretical; they have manifested in tangible consequences. Most DSA members fail to actively participate in the organization and don’t identify with any of these factions.
However, following 2023, it seems the DSA’s guidance has succumbed to the control of the extremist sect. This sect controversially defeated a resolution, further instigating the fragmented nature of the organization, which is disappearing from the national landscape.
The DSA has devolved into independent branches, each tackling their own projects without a common strategy. The largest hub lies in New York City with over 11,000 members, courtesy of the mainstream sector whereas the dominant figures in smaller cities align with the extremist sect.
Such sectionalism hampers the capacity of the DSA to forge a unanimous path forward. This is not a new issue; the organization has long suffered from disputes between different factions as founder Harrington once noted, criticizing the discord between ‘confrontationists’ and those bearing more radical beliefs.
Regrettably, democratic socialist hopefuls aspiring to gain influence through mass campaigns and elections now find themselves burdened by their cohabitation within the DSA with non-democratic ‘confrontationists.’
These well-intentioned individuals, in their quest to construct a political force capable of seizing power, are faced with a serious quandary: they must choose their allies wisely if they want to avoid being tainted by association with those exhibiting anti-democratic ideologies.
The post Radical Socialism on the Rise as Zohran Mamdani Eyes NYC Mayoral Seat appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
