Based partly on pledges to expel immigrants with criminal convictions and without legal validity, Donald Trump succeeded in securing the position as President. His initial executive directives, which sought to overturn birthright citizenship and put a hold on crucial refugee services, made it evident that he intended to target even legally recognized immigrants. Trump’s broad-based expulsion plan was bolstered at every stage, with a willing Congress and an acquiescent Cabinet. The U.S. Supreme Court became the latest participant this week.
On Monday, the Supreme Court revealed a fundamental decision, with scarce explanation, permitting the federal government to discriminate against Latino residents under the pretext of immigration enforcement. This particular judgment, while directly concerning federal agent deployment in Los Angeles, is presumed to extend to other urban areas earmarked for militarization by the president – Chicago this week, perhaps another city the next.
The ruling by the Supreme Court followed the administration’s disclosure of a fresh twist in its legal fight with Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident originally mistakenly deported to a megaprison in El Salvador. In recent attempts to execute his removal, various countries have been considered, including Eswatini in Africa.
The Supreme Court allowed the administration to use race as a factor in the pursuit of its widespread deportation project on Monday. While the judgment originated from a California lawsuit, its implications will undoubtedly reverberate nationwide as the president endeavors to expand National Guard deployment in U.S. cities.
Back in June, when National Guard troops were first brought into Los Angeles, unsettling accounts surfaced of undercover Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers vehemently confronting individuals they claimed, with virtually no proof, to be illegal residents. A collection of California citizens initiated a legal action against the administration, condemning them for racial profiling.
The Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit’s restraining order, withholding any clarification of its rationale. This was achievable as this case was processed through the court’s ‘shadow docket’. The administration maintains its intent to target only immigrants with criminal backgrounds. However, an analysis of apprehensions made by federal agents in California revealed that nearly 68% were without a criminal record and around 57% had no criminal charges whatsoever.
The decision from the Supreme Court empowers federal agents to carry on their racially discriminative pursuits in various communities. This judgment coincides with the President’s threats to implement similar tactics in Chicago and his unwavering effort to wipe out legal safeguards for over one million immigrants from Haiti and Venezuela. Further adding to the situation, he’s proceeding to establish an entirely separate law enforcement body for immigration regulation.
The legal skirmish over Garcia’s deportation remains unresolved, with the administration now aiming to deport him to the southern Africa state of Eswatini. This shift signifies the third country the federal government has considered for Garcia’s expulsion in the last month. Meanwhile, Garcia’s legal counsel tirelessly pursues an asylum case in an attempt to secure his stay in the U.S. with his family.
Federal agents recently oversaw a surprising raid at a Hyundai factory under construction in a remote part of Peach State. Almost 500 people, predominantly South Korean nationals, were arrested. The workers, in the country legally under the B-1 business visitor visa scheme, were only due to be in the U.S. for a few weeks, a regular custom amongst foreign companies with local operations.
Homeland Security stated that the unexpected factory raid followed the acquisition of a federal search warrant, with Hyundai currently facing an intense criminal investigation over accusations of illegal employment practices.
Included as a part of the campaign promises that led to his presidency, Donald Trump’s vow to execute the deportation of immigrants who were criminally charged and undocumented was clear. It wasn’t long after he took office that his successive executive orders, targeted at the revocation of birthright citizenship and stalling key refugee initiatives, indicated an intent to confront immigrants who were legally residing in the country as well.
Trump’s aggressive deportation plan received cooperation at every step, with supportive legislation and a compliant executive body. The U.S. Supreme Court added itself to the complicit entities this week.
Without coherent justification, a consequential ruling by the Supreme Court now grants the federal government the power to employ racial profiling against Latino individuals under the cloak of immigration enforcement. Despite this ruling’s immediate relevance to the increasing presence of federal officials in Los Angeles, it could also potentially apply to additional cities lined up for heightened militarization – Chicago in the current week, and a potential new location the following week.
Closely following this ruling, the government shared an unexpected update on the ongoing legal confrontation with Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland-based man mistakenly deported to a giant prison in El Salvador. With Garcia’s third country of deportation potentially being Eswatini in Africa, the government is increasing its efforts in recent weeks to locate a country for his removal.
After the initial deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June, a series of disturbing incidents arose involving masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers targeting individuals who were alleged, largely without substantial evidence, of residing illegally in the country.
The post Supreme Court Grants Power to Racially Profile in Immigration Enforcement appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
