Lately, there seems to be a growing sentiment among people on the Right, one that portrays the Left as increasingly dangerous and terrifying. The sentiment frames the aggression as coming from a place of intolerance for the supposed purity and innocence that the Right supposedly embodies. While it might seem like an exaggeration, it unfortunately isn’t. Let’s examine, for example, a message from last week that reflects this sentiment.
According to this paradigm, there is a menacing ideology arising in the country that despises all that is positive, fair, and charming while praising all that is vile and distorted. It is an ideology that opposes family and nature and is void of any human essence. The narrative depicts this ideology as envious, spiteful, and inhumane, showing disdain for harmonious families and supporting wrongdoers.
This ideology is portrayed as being relentlessly on a mission to extinguish every trace of elegance and charm, while welcoming all that is grotesque and immoral. It is seen as a force leading towards violence against those who maintain order, faith, the family, and uphold the righteousness of the world. Within this ideology, the common thread seems to be an overpowering desire for demolition.
The effects of this ideology are purportedly seen in every online post that cheers for heinous homicides, like the one that cruelly deprived our nation of one of its notable figures. It is suggested that the survival of millions depends on the obliteration of this malevolent ideology; that the survival of our children, our society, and our civilization hinges on it.
The long-standing commitment is illustrated as centered around extinguishing this essential menace with love and unbending resolve. If one visits the social media platform, formerly known locally as Twitter, you would find a persistent amplification of this narrative. Believers of this narrative won’t be swayed by alternative facts or viewpoints.
In an instance where a user asked Elon Musk’s robotic companion Grok about the political affiliation responsible for most instances of political violence, the reply pinpointed the Right as being the foremost perpetrators. After the resultant indignation of Musk, he had the automaton reconfigured to match his viewpoint, altering its entire perspective, a change that consequently transformed the robot into a far more rigid entity, unceremoniously named ‘Mechahitler’.
It appears that now even the Department of Justice is hinting at a similar notion. A media outlet, 404 Media, has reported that a research paper arguing that right-wing violence surpasses violence from the left wing has abruptly vanished from the Department of Justice’s web portal this week. This paper was published just the previous year.
The research highlighted the sharp incline in violent extremism characterized by militant nationalism and white supremacism in the United States. The study indicated that since 1990, far-right extremists have been responsible for more ideologically fueled homicides than any extreme left-wing groups or radical Islamic extremists. The paper pointed to over 227 incidents that claimed more than 520 lives.
A recent threat assessment by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security suggested that domestically originated violent extremists pose an imminent threat. The report emphasized the potential of COVID-19 pandemic-related stressors, deep-rooted ideological grievances tied to immigration, and narratives concerning electoral fraud to continue acting as justifications for violently aggressive actions.
The exact reasons for the sudden removal of the investigative study from the DOJ website are unclear, but the timing certainly raises eyebrows. Actions of this nature generally don’t occur without specific motivations.
The recent mantra of ‘This is our Reichstag fire’ is concerning for a reason. Knowledge of history gives us a chilling context – the Reichstag fire was used by the Nazis to further amplify the resentment against Jewish people, leading up to the Holocaust. By leveraging fear after such a tragic event, the Nazis were able to manipulate the masses.
Manipulation of facts to stimulate fear in the populace is not a new strategy. It has repeatedly been employed by individuals seeking to exert control. This can be seen in the present-tense discussions about deploying the National Guard to address ‘crimes’ in urban areas.
The agenda behind such discussions is to foster a climate of fear, enabling them to execute their objectives unchecked. By creating a threatening atmosphere, they are paving the way for condemning critique as ‘hate speech’.
But we should remain hopeful that fear will not be the driving factor this time around. It is crucial that we arm ourselves with knowledge and understanding to question the narrative being pushed forward.
When considering these transpired events and putting them into perspective, we should be cautious about narratives that seek to divide and instill fear in us. It becomes necessary to objectively examine the factors that are pushing these narratives and to continually challenge them.
In conclusion, while narratives that paint one side as purely evil and the other as outright saints undoubtedly make for compelling storytelling, the reality is often more nuanced. Therefore, it’s vital to approach such narratives with skepticism, understanding, and a readiness to question.
The post The Rising Sentiment of Divisiveness: A New Fear appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
