The objective of the current governing body to significantly disrupt the flourishing $40 billion offshore wind industry in the United States persists. The government recently issued an unexpected directive to discontinue the New England Wind 1 and 2 ventures, a prominent development that was set to cater to the electrical needs of nearly 900,000 households. This abrupt termination represents the third intervention within a fortnight to stall consequential offshore wind initiatives.
Just a month earlier, the execution of the Revolution Wind project, that was well on the way towards final completion along the coasts of Connecticut and Rhode Island, was abruptly rescinded. As the project was already 80% to completion, hundreds of workers have been untenably dismissed due to this sudden decision. The current governing body is also contemplating the discontinuation of four additional offshore wind projects that are presently being erected.
In an alarming revelation made by The New York Times recently, it has been uncloaked that the central administration has commanded assorted federal departments to strategize and implement ways to stifle the offshore wind industry. Interestingly, they have roped in departments that typically have no direct correlation with energy policies. The overall intent appears to be based on producing any conceivable reason that would vindicate the closure of wind projects.
For instance, the Department of Health and Human Services is assigned the duty of analyzing the potential impact of the electromagnetic fields emanated by wind turbines on human health. Meanwhile, the Defense Department is taking on the quest to investigate any plausible threats these projects might instigate to national security. This indicates a skewed perspective towards clean energy – considering it a threat to national security, hence promoting ignorance at the cost of environmental sustainability.
Particular animosity towards wind energy can be traced back to a personal experience of President Trump in relation to his Scottish golf course, about 14 years back. Concurrently, his staunch disbelief in climate science, which he perceives as an unfounded narrative contrived by liberals to disproportionately target the US government and funnel funds into countries he has less regard for, further solidifies his stance against clean energy.
Many believe this could also have roots in a drive to undermine any accomplishments gathered during Joe Biden’s term, stemming from the controversy of alleged anomalies during the 2020 election. It’s the amalgamation of all these enmeshing resentments, further emboldened with the backing from gigantic oil corporations – powerful benefactors – resulting in this heightened adversity against wind energy.
Trump’s contradictory viewpoints on the subject of vaccination have made the headlines on various occasions. Prior to his presidential candidacy in 2016, he propagated an idea linking vaccines to autism. However, during the recent pandemic, he sought admiration for what he claimed was his personal effort in the development of the COVID vaccine.
The steadfast determination of the administrative body to halt offshore wind projects transversely over multiple agencies is significant. It indicates a change in perspective from Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, who previously championed Clean Energy Week and proudly emphasized that a third of North Dakota’s electricity stemmed from wind.
Burgum’s recent speculations around threats to national security due to potential undersea drones are unsubstantiated. The Pentagon had previously assessed these risks and concluded that any disturbances caused by wind turbines to radar could be mitigated through meticulous planning along with technological enhancements.
According to a study by the Interior Department, the effects created by undersea cables are negligibly minimal. Any slight apprehension is being propagated with malintent as a serious obstruction. Despite the unavailability of concrete scientific proof, the decision to negate vaccination requirements is moving forward with flamboyant discourse whilst undermining the possible transmission of deadly diseases.
Even the concept of tree pollution, a topic brought up by Reagan, seems to have been misunderstood. It is essential to understand that trees do indeed emit volatile organic hydrocarbons that participate in creating smog. Nevertheless, its impact is minuscule in comparison to the damage inflicted by vehicular emissions and industrial pollution.
In this volatile climate, it becomes imperative to uphold the sanctity of scientific research and evidence in providing clear guidance for policy decisions. A balanced perspective, that considers both the environmental footprint and the economic implications of energy policies, could establish a clear path towards a sustainable future.
While it’s essential to address any potential risks that these projects may pose to national security, it requires an evidence-based approach. The merit of broad involvement across federal agencies in assessing and mitigating these risks should be driven by comprehensive and scientific analyses, rather than personal prejudices or political leanings.
The dual challenge of reversing the impacts of climate change and satisfying our growing energy demands calls for unprecedented levels of innovation and collaboration. Thus, as we continue to approach a future heavily reliant on renewable energy principles, it’s both practical and prudent that these principles are the guiding light leading us away from insupportable practices, towards greener and cleaner energy policies.
The post The Unexpected Curtailment of Milestone Offshore Wind Projects appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
