The recent unfortunate event in Minneapolis saw two children’s lives tragically ended at a church, with an additional 17 people injured. The individual behind the act, Robin W. Westman, had a history of holding considerable resentment, particularly towards Jews, which was reflected in the antisemitic inscriptions found on her guns. It was reported that Westman, who fired through the church’s stained glass windows, used to attend the school at Annunciation Catholic Church. Law enforcement’s investigations did not as yet reveal any specific motive for her disturbing actions.
Exploring Westman’s digital footprint unravels a troubling record of excessive hostility and resentment. Her social media activities included random videos depicting her fixation on firearms, violence, and school shootings. In addition, Westman exhibited a collection of firearms, ammunition, and objects that resembled explosive devices, marked with antisemitic and racist slurs, and threats targeted at then-President Donald Trump. Her vendetta against President Trump and antisemitic leanings surely indicate a dangerous mindset.
Westman’s videos additionally revealed diary excerpts with lengthy records expressing self-loathing, violence propagated against children, and a willingness to inflict harm on herself. The expressions were coded in the English language using Cyrillic characters. Strangely, a diary sticker displayed L.G.B.T.Q. and transgender flags alongside a firearm and the slogan ‘Defend Equality.’ Driven by a patchy fury (she legally obtained her firearms), Westman’s actions prove utterly shocking and sobering.
Switching topics, the New York Times editorial board has responded to Trump’s endeavor to oust Lisa Cook, one of the Federal Reserve Board’s governors. Trump rendered the law as somewhat flexible in this context, expressing his intentions to reshape the Federal Reserve leadership for not giving in to his demands of lowering interest rates. According to him, ‘potentially criminal’ behavior justified his pursuit of firing Cook. These allegations lack the necessary backbone of substantial proof, but they serve as a smokescreen for his agenda.
To legitimize his power game, Trump misguidedly accuses Cook of owning two primary residences. The New York Times has appropriately challenged these claims in their op-ed titled, ‘Where’s your evidence, Mr. President?’ There is an absence of any concrete evidence quashing Cook’s credibility, yet Trump audaciously alleges that she made false declarations on her mortgage agreements. Unfounded allegations shouldn’t be the means by which to manipulate institutions for vested interests.
The fear of political intrusion in the central bank’s functioning is concerning, as it could lead to undesirable economic repercussions. Yes, governors make errors – interest rates have been kept too high or too low. Still, Cook and her peers serve as the lawfully appointed agents of the American people, striving to fulfill their duty, despite the occasional misstep. This narrative paints a rather bleak picture of the Trump administration’s respect for autonomously functioning bodies.
The confusion in this situation is further amplified by the Supreme Court’s intervening decision. The judges granted increased authority to the President to dismiss officials from independent agencies, such as the National Labor Relations Board, but provided an exception for the Federal Reserve. Trump’s intended ousting of Cook, thus, is on a collision course with the conservative court majority he had a hand in shaping. It remains to be seen how the courts would protect the very ruling they sanctioned.
If we lend credence to Trump’s accusatory narrative, what if Cook’s actions were indeed duplicitous rather than mere blunders? But then again, the challenge presents itself, Where is your evidence, Mr. President?’ Authentic inquisition or smear campaign? Only time and due process of law will tell.
In the quest for control over Washington D.C., Trump advocated capital punishment for all convicted of murder in the Capital. There is a further claim that congress would assist him in extending his federal control over D.C. However, his power to assume command over the city’s police department is time-bound, which mandates a congressional approval after 30 days for its extension.
As for his endorsement of expanded usage of capital punishment, it might require legal amendments, facing significant legal and socio-political obstacles. Interestingly, the D.C. Council abolished capital punishment in 1981 but Trump, obviously disregarding the people’s sentiments, expressed in the 1992 referendum to restitute the death penalty, is determined to march to his own drumbeat.
Contrary to Trump’s proclamation, death penalty has shown no prophylactic effects on murder rates. Even staunch supporters of the death penalty are not in favor of its application to all convicted murderers. Policies backed by emotions rather than empirical evidence do not contribute to effective governance.
In a startling decision, Trump announced seizing control over Washington’s historical rail terminal, Union Station. His Transportation Secretary claimed it would bring more vendors, generate more revenue, and transform it into the world’s premier railway station. However, the planning process and timeline for the project remained unclear, as did the tactics to transform this federally owned land.
The Transportation Department had been the owner of Union Station since the early 1980s but had delegated the managing operations and projected upgrades to the Union Station Redevelopment Corporation, a local nonprofit. Subsequently, management and operations shifted under Amtrak’s control via a sublease. The government exercises controlling interest over Amtrak, with its board appointed by the president.
With the mounting costs associated with Amtrak despite the deteriorating state of the station, it is a matter of concern and priority to focus on improving Amtrak’s conditions. Only time will tell if the gamble to take over Union Station yields fruitful results which benefit the people, and not just a select few. All things considered, it appears that the Trump administration navigated choppy waters rather than clear ones.
The post Tragic Shooting at Minneapolis Church Stuns Community appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
