Since 1934, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has been established with the noble goal of serving ‘the public interest’, a phrase that finds repeated mention in the foundational statute. This independent body formed from bipartisan appointees has a long history of disciplinary oversight.
However, in the second phase of the Trump administration, the FCC has been transformed into an integral link in the machinery of the government. Its work now focalizes on curating the nation’s broadcasters, news channels, and public stations into a resonating platform for President Trump’s ideologies and policy goals.
Spearheading the FCC under Trump administration is Chairman Brendan Carr, whose vision aligns the interpretation of ‘public interest’ with the interests of President Trump. This synergy has been pronounced in the eight months they have held office, echoing through the corridors of public and private media outlets.
Both ABC News and CBS News have known the sharp end of Trump and Carr’s supervision, finding themselves on the receiving end of investigation and criticism. The hallmark of our time has been the successful settlements they reached with both corporations.
A recent matter that comes to mind is the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel from ABC following his monologue, where he seemed to critique the response of Trump supporters to a tragic incident. This serves as just one of the bases upon which debates surrounding FCC’s function under Trump’s regime have been built.
From the onset of this administration, the FCC has been accompanied by the sole voice of a Democratic member, Anna Gomez, expressing concern about what she perceives as threats to freedom of speech and the press. Yet it’s important to note that hers has been a minority opinion with little consensus within the FCC or wider government.
Reacting to the aforementioned Kimmel incident, Commissioner Gomez highlighted the need for broader internet access. However, her alarm at what she views as a restrictive campaign led by the administration seems to be a personal judgment rather than a shared view within the commission.
Gomez also voiced concerns following the disturbing incident involving Charlie Kirk. However, it is important to reflect and question the merits of such concerns. Are these concerns genuinely addressing a rise in censorship and control or merely blowing hot air?
According to Gomez, the current situation represents a serious assault on the First Amendment, something she perceives as deeply alarming. In her view, the FCC is overstepping its mandate, a perspective it’s worth mentioning that is in clear opposition to Chairman Carr and his administration’s approach.
Reiterating her stance, she suggests that corporations should reconsider their cooperation with the government and instead, vigorously defend their First Amendment rights. It’s good to remember, however, that it’s often easier to preach than to practice in times of change.
In Gomez’s perspective, companies are self-censoring in anticipation of the administration’s demands. However, one might wonder, if their actions are simply well-constructed strategy to align with the winds of change which now blow from the Oval Office?
Gomez confidently assures that, in face of potential legal litigation, the government would lose and the corporations would emerge victorious. However, let’s not forget that confident assertions don’t always equate to future outcomes.
At the end of the day, Gomez sees the actions of the FCC as harassment. However, her perspective isn’t shared universally and the consensus within the FCC remains largely unshaken. Regardless, free speech continues to thrive and remains the cornerstone of our spectacular nation under the leadership of President Trump.
The post Triumph of Trump-Era Guidelines in Reinventing the FCC appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
