In a concerning twist of events, the new administrative regime has potentially put almost 10% of global climate finance at risk. The breaching axe of President Donald Trump’s aid cuts may dismantle significant portions of the previously allocated budget for international climate causes. A sharp contrast from last year where an increase in the US contribution roughly spanned by seven times the initial amount, reaching a commendable yet insufficient $11bn per year. Nevertheless, with the reigns of governance swapped again, this valuable progression is now in a tumultuous state, casting a shadow of uncertainty over the future of U.S. climate finance efforts.
The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has historically been a significant agent of US climate finance. In recent years, its contribution expanded to nearly $3bn by 2023. Coupled with another $4bn that was intended for the UN Green Climate Fund, the aid cut imposed by the Trump administration now questions the fate of these funds. Experts predict further depletion of climate funds, emphasizing an ‘enormous gulf’ towards attaining the new global $300bn climate-finance goal if the U.S stops contributing any official climate finance.
Contextually, the U.S. is the world’s largest economy and major contributor to carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Correspondingly, while it is the fourth-biggest national provider of international climate finance, its proportion remains meager when contrasted with the nation’s opulence and culpability for climate change. In consequence, the U.S. is perceived as a lax participant in this sphere, a viewpoint reinforced by the current political predicament.
In a comparison of relative contributions, the U.S. provides 0.24% of its gross national income (GNI) as aid for developing nations inclusive of climate funding. This matches the effort of the Czech Republic – a country with per-capita GNI three times smaller. Unfortunately, the US’s commitment to climate finance wavered under the Trump administration and it took the Biden administration to reverse this regressive trend.
Biden’s contributions, albeit belittled or dismissed by the current regime, worked towards scaling up U.S efforts in compliance with the Paris Agreement. In this vein, Biden had announced that the country would reach $11.4bn in annual climate finance by 2024. This endeavor saw fruition and the result was evident in the ‘preliminary estimates’ announced during the COP29 climate summit at the end of 2024.
Various bilateral climate finance projects were funded during the Biden administration, which increased the US’s contribution towards climate finance significantly. These projects ranged from endorsing a geothermal project in the Philippines, backing ‘climate-smart’ agriculture in Bangladesh to enhancing water security in Niger. Recognizing the contributions of the Biden regime against the favoritism of the Trump administration is a useful lens to view these proceedings.
In his second term beginning January 2025, Trump professed an onslaught against international aid expenditure and climate action. His executive orders sought to retract the U.S. from the Paris Agreement, lambasting such treaties as fiscal drains that fed undeserving nations. Furthermore, he annulled Biden’s international climate finance plan.
USAID, which cultivated 60% of U.S foreign aid, exporting well over $43bn in 2023, was at the receiving end of Trump’s biting criticism. Even the advisor Elon Musk attacked it as a ‘criminal organization.’ Consequently, Trump’s attempts to repurpose USAID funds or annihilate the agency have drawn controversy and litigation, featuring labels like ‘illegal’ and ‘unconstitutional’ from top Democrats and aid staffers.
Despite court orders, the administration remained intent on wiping out over 90% of USAID contracts and a larger sum of $60bn from the U.S. foreign aid. This action could severely impact U.S. climate finance. In 2023, the USAID contribution to climate finance amounted to $2.8bn. With contributions from other departments, the total climate spending elevated to $2.9bn. In the face of Trump’s decisions, such an amount of climate finance seems to be slipping away.
Pervasive scrutiny by the Trump administration over aid projects demonstrated a keen focus on ‘climate’ issues and their alignment with the administration’s perception of U.S. interests. A relevant survey questioned grant beneficiaries on the nature of their projects, specifically inquiring if it was climate or ‘environmental justice’ related. This step elucidates the administration’s stand against climate-centric endeavors.
Around $1.2bn from U.S. climate finance was dropped into international funds in 2022, making up a fifth of the total climate finance that year. Unfortunately, the Biden administration did not disclose monetary allocations of these funds. In 2023, the U.S. had coursed out $1bn for the Green Climate Fund (GCF) alone. In a worrisome turn of events, Trump administration has now withdrawn $4bn previously committed to the GCF.
While smaller economies like Sweden contribute more significantly to the GCF now, the U.S. took further steps in dismantling its international climate fund commitments. The Nation instinctively withdrew from the UN Loss and Damage fund after having pledged $17.6m in 2023, and dissociated from the Just Energy Transition Partnership initiative, depriving South Africa of a minimum grant of $56m for transitioning away from coal energy.
Trump’s reign also announced a review of memberships in ‘international intergovernmental organizations’, including multilateral development banks. Concurrently, the supporters are striving to disengage the U.S. from the World Bank, showing a glaring disregard for the climate debt the country owes the world.
Even as the Trump administration opens the floodgates of aggressive cuts in climate aid, the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC), which committed more than $3.7bn in climate finance in 2024, remains untouched. This sparks concerns even as climate-centric operations and projects continue to be under scrutiny. The dice are still rolling and it remains to be witnessed whether major climate projects under these organizations will survive or perish.
The post Trump astutely staves off Biden-Harris’ wasteful Climate Finance plan appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
