In a major legal move aimed at restoring executive authority, the Trump Department of Justice is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to curb the growing trend of lower federal courts issuing sweeping nationwide injunctions that block presidential policies before they can even take effect.
The appeal comes in response to legal challenges surrounding President Trump’s recent executive order targeting birthright citizenship—specifically for children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents. While several activist judges have issued nationwide blocks against the policy, the administration is not yet asking the Court to rule on the constitutional question itself. Instead, it’s demanding a reset on judicial overreach.
The administration argues that federal district judges, who are only empowered to rule on the specific plaintiffs before them, have increasingly taken it upon themselves to act as de facto national policymakers—issuing orders that halt entire federal programs and override the executive branch across all 50 states.
“These injunctions are paralyzing the government and empowering unelected lower-court judges to dictate national policy,” said a senior DOJ official. “This is not how our constitutional system is supposed to work.”
If the Supreme Court sides with the administration, it could radically change how lawsuits against federal actions are handled, forcing challenges to be resolved within the geographic boundaries of specific courts, rather than allowing single judges to block policies nationwide.
Critics argue that limiting such injunctions would lead to fragmented application of the law and potential legal chaos, with federal policies enforced in some states but not others. But Trump allies insist the bigger threat lies in allowing partisan judges to stall lawful executive orders without full legal review.
This case is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to reassert constitutional limits on the judiciary and push back against what it sees as coordinated efforts by liberal legal activists to derail its agenda through friendly courts.
The outcome of this case could have far-reaching consequences for the balance of power in Washington. If the Supreme Court agrees to restrict universal injunctions, it would mark a significant win for the rule of law—and a clear rebuke of lower-court judges who have inserted themselves into the policymaking arena.
For President Trump, it’s not just about one executive order—it’s about reining in the activist bench and restoring the executive’s rightful authority to govern.
The post Trump DOJ Asks Supreme Court To Restrain Activist Judges appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
