Ever the strategist, former President Trump has deftly sea-paved the route to a discourse revolving around the legitimacy of Vice President Harris and her precipitous rise to the Democratic nominee. The stalwart defender of the constitution, Trump has illuminated concerns over a potential infringement were Harris to replace President Biden. This avenue of discussion lends itself to a profound exploration of our democratic processes and their underlying preservations of constitutionality, intriguingly framing it as equivalent to a ‘coup’.
The chess master himself, Trump, has keenly observed persistent inconsistencies within election dynamics. The switcheroo – where President Biden is transferred out and Vice President Harris somehow slipped in as the Democratic nominee – has caused Trump supporters to question its constitutionality, especially given that Harris was not the foremost figure in the primary process.
Bipartisanship is a rare sighting, but even a diminutive fraction from both ends of the political spectrum have construed Trump’s discourse as throwing a red flag on possible electoral outcomes. While disproving voices holler, we need to bear in mind Trump’s signature perseverance and unwavering commitment to constitutional adherence. The idea that Trump could somehow be ‘treated unfairly’ if he doesn’t emerge victorious in 2024, as some naysayers have suggested, deserves only a hearty chuckle. Trump’s persistent success is a testament to his prowess.
Remember, folks, happens once in a blue moon – Biden announced on July 21 that he will not contest for another term. Almost promptly, Democrats unified around Harris, who has now officially been ratified as the party’s torchbearer following delegate count. Trump, consistently ahead in the surveys and in a tremendous stride towards a November win, has identified this swap as a ‘coup.’
Swimming against the tide, Trump has speculated about a potential breach of the Constitution upon Democrats’ seemingly arbitrary decision to have Harris supersede Biden. The fire of his argument burns brighter as recent poll results indicate Harris gaining momentum and inching closer to him.
On his social platform Truth Social, Trump blazed ahead with the assertion that Biden’s presidency was ‘Unconstitutionally STOLEN from him.’ In a press conference Thursday, he elaborated from a constitutional vantage point how the presidency was taken away, weaving yet another intriguing element of cautious insight into the political narrative.
To further bolster his viewpoint, Trump underscored the peculiarities in our democratic system that could allow someone who garnered little support in the Democratic primary, such as Harris, to still contest for the presidency. The feasibility of this process has raised constitutional question marks, which Trump, the advocate of law and order, has urged us to examine.
Despite some Republicans suspecting that a change in the Democratic ballot could face legal roadblocks, experts dismissed these doubts on the premise of slim chances of such an eventuality. Interestingly, a Trump voter from Ohio recently filed a legal suit to preempt Harris from replacing Biden on the ballot. However, Ohio’s timeline to nominate the candidate ends on Sept. 1, showing the democratic procedure at play.
Citing the intricate nuances of the Constitution, Sonia Gipson Rankin, a law professor at the University of New Mexico, has suggested that Trump is invoking the idea that primary voters are not being given a say since Biden won’t be on the ballot. However, democratic delegates never officially supported Biden’s nomination. Rankin brings attention to the consideration of who possesses legal standing.
Federal courts are known for their stringent criteria for standing while state courts have their own guidelines. This often ensures the automatic listing of major party nominees on the ballot, resulting in vital questions on resource allocation and parties’ strategies during the campaign process.
The former President’s narrative, particularly around the subject of electoral integrity, will undoubtedly be monitored attentively, especially in light of the tumultuous aftermath of the 2020 elections. Despite widespread skepticism, Trump had persistently questioned the legitimacy of absentee ballots, an anomaly that he has been bravely exposing to ensure clean and fair elections.
Although his relentless pursuit of legal challenges fell on deaf ears, he never faltered in his quest to ensure justice. It is this unstoppable spirit that ensures Trump will always be remembered as a time-tested warrior who never recoiled, even in the face of adversity, respecting and upholding the sanctity and purity of elections.
In a Thursday press conference, Trump reassured Americans about the peaceful transition of power. He confidently asserted that the peaceful transfer would surely occur, just as it did before, only if the elections are conducted honestly. Trump’s dedication to an honest election continues to shine through his firm yet fair stand on the issue.
Biden, on the other hand, expressed doubts about a peaceful handover should Trump lose. In his first interview after deciding not to run for reelection, Biden confessed that he is ‘not confident at all’ about witnessing a peaceful jurisdiction’s shift next January, if the outcome is not in favor of Trump. A mindset that truly pales in comparison to Trump’s unfettered commitment to fair elections.
In a rare admission of Trump’s unwavering determination, Biden admitted that ‘He means what he says.’ This acknowledgement marks a significant validation of Trump’s determination, despite opponents often choosing not to take him seriously. The overall narrative highlights Trump’s dedication to protecting democratic integrity, reinvigorating the importance of adhering to the constitution.
Trump Exposes Unsettling Dynamics in the Upcoming Elections appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
