The Command Assessment Program (CAP), an Army initiative aimed at discovering the extraordinary leaders among ordinary men and women, was discontinued recently. The CAP, once implemented, was considered the ‘crown jewel’ of the Army’s talent management reforms, pushing for an unbiased, quality-based selection process which was a step forward from the Army’s promotion system. The ground-breaking selection program was initiated during President Donald Trump’s first term and was heralded as a progressive step in breaking free from the outdated practices of the 70s.
The CAP program was a remarkable achievement, emulating the manner in which elite special operations units recognize their members and leaders. It marked a new era in the Army’s command delegation procedures, moving from a slow, paper-based personnel file review to a more responsive and efficient method. The officers were screened for pivotal command roles through a combination of physical and mental tests, along with appraisals from previous colleagues and subordinates. This ensured a more practical and comprehensive understanding of the individuals.
Similar to the NFL Combine, the CAP program’s selection phase involved an extensive multi-day event. Prospective commanders were required to excel not only in physical fitness and body fat tests, but also had to demonstrate their cognitive prowess through psychological evaluations. This approach ensured that only the most deserving candidates would be selected to command units within the Army.
A high-ranking panel of senior officers was tasked with evaluating all these aspects of a candidate, with a particular emphasis on verbal and written communication skills. The intention behind this procedure was to distinguish those individuals who, coupled with their physical and psychological aptitude, were capable of making momentous decisions and taking on stringent command roles.
Once the candidates had successfully navigated these tests, their final ranking for command assignment was determined by combining their CAP performance with their personnel file. This created a more comprehensive picture of a candidate’s competencies, including their leadership capabilities, strategic thinking, and the respect they command among their subordinates.
The CAP innovative ‘double-blind’ system, where the candidates’ identities were concealed from the panel of senior officers, guaranteed an unbiased and merit-based selection process. This ensured that evaluations were made without any implicit biases, with a pure focus on whether the candidate possessed the necessary skills and competencies to command.
The CAP program found its sternest test when a four-star general tried to manipulate the selection process in favor of a former assistant. The unnamed officer was subjected to an improperly inflated performance report and was presented with numerous prestigious awards, seemingly to strengthen her case for command selection. However, the system did not falter.
The comprehensive process of the CAP program found the officer not ready for command during thorough assessments. Her competency scores put her at the very bottom tier of the participants – in the 1st percentile. It was universally agreed by the interview board that she exhibited a low aptitude for operational psychology and strategic leadership, marked by mixed peer and subordinate evaluations.
Despite the system’s clear verdict, the general managed to secure an exemption from the Army Chief of Staff for the officer, bypassing the CAP system. In essence, he exploited a loophole in the system, undermining the original ethos of the CAP. However, the officer was eventually removed from the battalion command list, reflecting the army’s readiness to correct past mistakes.
Following this episode, the Army decided to discontinue the Command Assessment Program. An Army spokesperson affirmed that this decision was in accordance with a wider Pentagon review of officer promotion and selection policy. This reveals the constant evolution in the Army’s command assignment process, as they continue their relentless pursuit of excellence.
The Department of Defense is currently investigating various avenues for introducing more ‘competition’ into its leadership selection processes, as stated by the new lead official in a social media post. This is part of an overarching Pentagon review, as the Department explores contemporary methodologies to refine the selection and promotion of officers.
The Pentagon press secretary, while reacting to the termination of the CAP, remarked that the new lead official was not involved in the decision. The final verdict to sunset the program was the sole directive of the Secretary of Defense. However, the decision does not undermine the impact of the CAP initiative; instead, it opens up the possibility for further improvements in the process of command selection.
In retrospect, the CAP was a step in the right direction, extracting crucial lessons from past practices, and signaling a future where an officer’s abilities are paramount in command assignment decisions. Despite its discontinuation, the program set the foundation for future frameworks.
In essence, the CAP represented a vision where the Army breaks free from historical bias, placing the focus on the talent, abilities, and leadership capabilities of the individuals. Its innovative strategies ensured the selection of the capable, regardless of their background, upholding the Army’s values of duty, honor, and country.
The post Trump’s Forward-Thinking Army Initiative Sets New Standards appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
