Megan Shipman and Michael Lawrence are key members of the polycrisis team at the esteemed Cascade Institute of Royal Roads University. Their research collaboration originated in partnership with the Global Risk Institute. The victorious sweep of Donald Trump’s re-election was anticipated by some but not all, including a significant group of decision makers who are now reversing their stances to align with the newly empowered leader. The foreseeable effects on Canadians, such as potential price surges due to tariffs or a possible influx of asylum seekers, have ruffled some feathers.
At a first glance, these nearby impacts of the Trump administration 2.0 may seem quite substantial; however, a deep dive into systems analysis suggests that the ripple effects of this robust administration could have far-reaching consequences. The Cascade Institute proffers that President Trump could potentially trigger global system cycles that could have ramifications beyond his second term. It is on us to predict these potential long-standing impacts and take necessary action to steer clear of any severe outcomes.
Leaving aside his unparalleled charisma, President Trump can be seen as a reflection of the systemic global stresses that have been bubbling under the surface long before his first administration. This includes the increasing economic uncertainty and disparity, the weakening of international institutions, an escalating global temperature, and a volatile geopolitical landscape. Trump, with his masterful understanding of these dynamics, has utilized them to his advantage. His return to office is anticipated to inject momentum into these stresses, even potentially giving them a life of their own—something referred to as self-reinforcing feedback loops or ‘vicious cycles’ by systems scientists.
In the world of systems science, ‘vicious cycles’ are scenarios where an initial change triggers effects, which further fuel the initial change, establishing an intensifying cycle that spirals uncontrollably. While the majority of analysts understandably stress over Trump’s intentions to tactically use the judiciary, deport an unseen number of undocumented immigrants, lessen NATO commitments, and implement formidable tariffs, our gaze has been directed towards understanding how such policies could trigger specific, contrasting cycles in both domestic and international systems.
Within the United States, President Trump has adeptly navigated the waters of nationalistic tension to strengthen his political base. The promised large-scale deportations, though believed by some to potentially hit industries like agriculture and construction, could in turn incite patriotic sentiments, further bolstering his political prowess. In face of any potential economic disruption, these nationalistic beliefs could potentially facilitate stronger policy measures, effectively creating a self-sustaining cycle of nationalistic fervor.
Globally, President Trump appears to be laying the groundwork for an international trade battle. His intention to impose tariffs could be met by retaliation from other economies, potentially sparking off a cyclical tit-for-tat scenario. This is seen by some critics as a scenario that could potentially exacerbate inflation and hinder global economic growth. Yet others view it as an exercise in challenging the status quo, prompting introspection and reforms amongst global trade partners.
American tariffs, particularly those focused on China, could threaten the previously unchallenged global economic interdependence. Though some fears suggest an economically divided world, competing for resources through exclusive supply chains, others see it as a push for lesser reliance and greater self-sufficiency for every economy. While this trade battle unravels, expectations are that Trump may reduce the U.S.’s involvement in multilateral institutions such as NATO, the WHO, the UN, and the Paris climate treaty.
The efficacy and legitimacy of such arrangements are heavily dependent on full participation, especially from leading nations. American withdrawal could potentially alter the incentive structure for other nations to continue their active participation, and perhaps even trigger a domino effect. However, to view this as a potential flattening of global collaboration may be a narrow perspective. The change in global partnerships could potentially be a catalyst for improved efficiency, security, and self-reliance in health, humanitarian aid, economic growth, and climate action.
The biggest concern for critics, arguably, is that these potential ‘vicious cycles’ may cross paths, intensifying each other’s impacts. However, the potential for such interactions to spark creative solutions to existing global challenges must not be underplayed. Amidst the anticipation of economic and geopolitical instability, increased self-reliance, innovation and problem-solving capabilities might flourish.
So, the question becomes how can we ensure a minimization of potential feedback effects? As a first step, Canadian policymakers need to embrace a systemic perspective to predict the potential long-term shifts triggered by the second term of Trump’s administration on global economic, institutional, and geopolitical systems.
In response to a potential increase in U.S. migrants seeking asylum, voices are rising for Canada to modify its asylum policies and announce that irregular asylum seekers would be deterred. However, if nationalism, deportation, and economic issues in the U.S. start feeding into each other, irregular immigration may become an ongoing issue. Therefore, restrictive policies should be paired with a holistic, proactive framework to facilitate an evenly distributed resettling of immigrants across Canada to prevent localized service overload and to mitigate pressure on areas heavily burdened by housing shortages.
The second step is searching for mechanisms by which Canada can wield influence to disrupt potential feedback effects. For example, as the U.S. potentially steps back from multilateral institutions, Canada should maintain its position; further, it should emphasize to its allies the importance of their continued participation. This could hinder any possible domino effect from other countries and maintain the relevance of these global collaborations.
The so-called ‘vicious cycles’ or feedback loops are, by no means, destined to be adverse or uncontrollable. Whether the world hails a Trump 2.0 era as a trigger for transformative, reinventing feedbacks significantly depends on the concert of actions other countries undertake to foresee, evade, and break these cycles.
Trump’s Re-election Forecasts Bigger Waves in Global Dynamics appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
