Set to occupy the Oval Office next month, President-elect Donald Trump has shared his intention to introduce significant tariffs, an action that has the potential to both revitalize American manufacturing and raise concerns over the possible surge in consumer prices. Simply put, tariffs refer to the taxes that U.S. companies remit to their government when procuring products that have been produced or sourced from foreign territories. Tariffs function in a variety of manners, such as imposing a predetermined percentage tax on the product’s total value, or setting a specific flat sum for each item.
Further, tariffs have the flexibility to come into effect only after a predetermined quantity of products have been brought in. Such duties can be imposed targeting certain goods, specific nations, or a combination of both. As an illustration, consider a Mexican firm specializing in the manufacture of light bulbs. The company has the choice to either cater to the local market or seek customers globally. They might eventually strike a bargain with an Oklahoma retailer, who orders a pallet of these bulbs to offer in their store.
When it comes to stocking goods, the retailer has the autonomy to make decisions. They could opt for the foreign product if it is more cost-effective, dependable, or if it’s a popular brand among consumers. However, should the U.S. government decide to impose a tariff on imported light bulbs from Mexico, the local retailer then faces a significant choice: either bear the additional cost of the tariff or find an alternative supplier.
Detractors of tariff policies foreground the impact it has on consumer prices – if the retailer from Oklahoma fails to secure a cheaper alternative to the light bulbs, consumers ultimately bear the brunt with increased prices. However, the intent behind such tariffs isn’t to inflate retail prices. Instead, they are designed as a barrier between international sellers and buyers, compelling retailers, like the one in Oklahoma, to consider other sources for their goods.
The light bulbs, for instance, could be sourced from a different nation, specifically one that the Trump administration aspires to cultivate relations with. Or, they could be products made within the U.S. borders in facilities manufacturing similar items. Making foreign products relatively more expensive may enhance the demand for locally-produced goods, fostering American manufacturing and perhaps even prompting companies to move their factories back to the U.S.
Trump’s move to impose an import tariff might provoke similar reactions from the affected countries, leading to a reflexive tariff on goods imported from the U.S. During the previous year, Oklahoma exported goods worth approximately $6.5 billion, including a substantial $2.5 billion to Canada, China, and Mexico. This could potentially limit access to these crucial markets for Oklahoma’s producers.
On his social media platforms, Trump has announced plans to implement a 25% tariff on all goods imported from China, Canada, and Mexico unless these countries take stringent measures to curb illegal immigration and fentanyl trafficking. Setting his sights on China, he has also threatened to impose a steep 60% tariff on goods arriving from the country.
Further in his plans, Trump threatened a 100% tariff on goods from BRICS-member nations should they decide to establish international trade in a non-U.S. currency. BRICS, as an economic consortium, is guided by Russia and China and includes Brazil, India, South Africa, Iran, United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, and Egypt.
Based on trade data collated by the U.S. Census Bureau, Canadian oil and gas imports have been identified as the most valuable to Oklahoma, with the import value in 2023 reaching over $7 billion. Canada also stands as a principal supplier of aerospace parts, varied machinery, and paper products to Oklahoma. From China, the state imported miscellaneous manufactured goods close to $669 million, along with sizeable quantities of machinery, plastics, electrical and computer equipment. Annually, China, with imports worth around $2.5 billion, is the state’s second-largest international supplier.
Ranked third as a supplier to Oklahoma, Mexico contributes approximately $1.1 billion through the export of machinery, iron, and steel, motor vehicles, and various other products. Drawing attention to the top five imported product categories from each country targeted by Trump’s tariffs, China exported miscellaneous manufactured commodities worth $668,649,212, and other general-purpose machinery worth $168,827,689 to Oklahoma.
Plastic products from China accounted for $150,840,829, followed by electrical equipment and components valued at $150,494,963. Oklahoma’s need for computer equipment was filled with imports from China totaling $143,349,054. As part of its lucrative oil and gas trade with Oklahoma, Canada exported goods valued at $7,184,136,990, and aerospace products and parts reaching $443,345,711.
Other general-purpose machinery imports were worth $100,685,192 while iron, steel, and ferroalloy worth $81,456,609 were also major trade items. Oklahoma also took in miscellaneous manufactured commodities from Canada drawing to $79,377,315. Considering Mexico’s trade with Oklahoma, other general-purpose machinery was valued at $160,228,049, followed by iron, steel, and ferroalloys coming to $132,767,272.
Motor vehicles were valued at $122,647,323 and navigational, measuring, and medical control instruments were worth $118,893,683. Electrical equipment made up for the rest at $65,556,054, making the trading relationship between Oklahoma and these three countries significant, and Trump’s plans surely set to change the dynamics.
Trump’s Steely Resolve: Boosting American Prosperity with New Trade Policies appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
