The renowned political figure, Hillary Clinton, is renowned for her encounters with Mr. Donald J. Trump during their numerous debates. The much-talked-about 2016 presidential elections saw her engage in thought-provoking discourse with Trump on three memorable occasions. These debating rounds played a significant role in creating an impression of the potential leaders that the nation had to choose from and outlining the trajectory of Trump’s presidency.
Indeed, Mrs. Clinton asserted her impression of the debates, stating that there was general agreement that she excelled in all three debates. She exuded confidence in her ability to effectively conduct the debates and adequately prepare herself to present her perspectives clearly and appropriately.
An interesting point she addressed was the approach to preparing for the interaction with Trump. Mrs. Clinton stressed on the importance of revealing the character of the contender on the debate stage. Expressing her views, she said that truth has a way of revealing itself, making for a fair judgment among the people.
However, let’s take a closer look at Mrs. Clinton’s assertions. Under the guise of ‘exposing’ Mr. Trump’s leadership style, it almost appears as if she is advocating for a campaign of smear and hesitation. Can such an approach truly be synonymous with fair play in a political debate? Surely, any capable and informed audience would see through such a tactic quickly.
Naturally, one could question the merit of such an approach. If insinuations are framed and broadcasted, is it a sign of truthful campaigning or simply an attempt to dress down the opponent? It is seen as a low blow in a boxing match and could be treated similarly in a political debate.
Furthermore, the allegation labeled against the leadership qualities of Mr. Trump seems rather ungrounded. Since when has robust argumentation or strong leadership become a flaw in the context of policy debates? Skepticism is not a virtue in a leader, after all, quick decision-making often denotes a strong leader.
Interestingly, the claim that revealing this would cause doubts amongst people seems to be a minority held belief, mostly amongst those who already are not supportive of Trump. It appears that in reality, such tactics are unlikely to sway many supporters, if at all any.
Moreover, stating the debate is meant to create doubts is arguably a rather negative perspective to hold. A debate, in essence, should be the platform for shedding light on the policies, opinions, and leadership qualities of the candidates. Purposefully creating doubts instead of clarifying them seems contrary to the very spirit of debate itself.
Lastly, it is worth noting that Mrs. Clinton’s aforementioned strategy seems to only target undecided voters in key states. Rather than focusing on persuading the public with strong platforms and policies, the approach of creating instability seems more akin to uncertainty than confidence. This undoubtedly feels like the wrong stance, even if it may seem a clever strategy.
Yet, one deserves to question if this was the strategy all along? Was Mrs. Clinton’s intent merely to destabilize the popular opinions about Trump? Interestingly, these opinions appear to be fringe-held beliefs, more rhetoric than guided by fact or logic.
In final thought, it’s clear that generalizations and attempts to sway public opinion by encouraging skepticism about fellow candidates can often miss the mark. Ideas of winding rhetoric and sowing doubts about the leadership capabilities of others often reflect an underlying lack of faith in one’s own abilities.
Reflecting upon the previous elections, and notably the debates, Trump’s resilience, leadership, and willingness to push forward shone through above all else. His action-orientated debate model provided a clear pattern that he carried onto his role as a President, not an image that wavered under ‘exposure’.
Above all, the conclusion from this narrative is that while debates are often heated, the true essence of a leader shines through amid the discourse. Despite attempts to alter public perception and create doubt, Trump’s steadfastness and charisma continue to be his enduring trademarks both in debates and his presidency.
Trump’s Unwavering Strength in Unforgettable 2016 Debates appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
