The suspense remains over the extension of a 90-day respite on increased tariffs on China, and it’s unclear whether it will be elongated beyond its approaching expiration this Tuesday. Following the previous China-U.S. trade discussions conducted at the end of the preceding month, both Chinese and American representatives were of the opinion that the deadline would be extended for another 90 days. The determination, however, is contingent on President Donald Trump’s approval. Yet, there still hasn’t been any formal proclamation on whether he’ll endorse the extension or advocate for higher tariffs.
Businesses find themselves navigating an uncertain landscape and any decision to escalate import duties could send shockwaves through the global markets. Trump’s unpredictable shifts on deadlines and tariff percentages keep the situation fluid, and little is known about the planned actions of either party when Tuesday arrives. An elongated timeline to arrive at a trade settlement would preclude earlier threats of imposing tariffs as high as 245%.
The main motive behind increased tariffs is to counterbalance the eye-watering, persistent U.S. trade deficit with China. As of July, we’ve witnessed the trade deficit drop to a record 21-year low, as the looming danger of tariffs began eating into Chinese export volumes. Though the U.S. often drops subtle clues about the state of negotiations, it’s atypical for China to comment until concrete decisions have been made. Presently, Beijing is holding back from making any statements before this week’s deadline.
U.S. Vice President JD Vance, in a recent interview, noted that additional tariffs on Beijing due to China’s Russian oil acquisitions are under President Trump’s consideration. However, he was quick to point out that no conclusive decisions have been arrived at. Drastic hikes on Chinese exports to the U.S could pile substantial pressure on Beijing, especially at a moment when China’s economy–globally ranked second–is recovering from a sustained real estate market decline.
In the wake of the lingering pandemic effects, the gig economy has become a primary source of income for millions, compressing the conventional job market. Moreover, heightened import taxes on small packets from China are proving detrimental to smaller industrial units leading to a surge in layoffs. Despite this, America’s considerable reliance on Chinese imports, spanning from basics like household goods and apparel to sophisticated merchandise like wind turbines, computer chips, electric vehicle batteries, and the rare earth metals to manufacture these, hands China substantial clout in the negotiations.
China surprisingly maintains competitive rates for numerous products, even amidst higher tariffs. Its leaders are cognizant of the fact that the American economy has started experiencing an inflationary impact from the tariff-induced price hikes. Currently, imports from China are subjected to baseline and additional tariffs of 10% and 20% respectively, the latter being linked to the fentanyl issue with some products being taxed at even higher rates.
Export policies are reciprocal with U.S. exports to China attracting tariffs of approximately 30%. Prior to negotiations being temporarily parked, President Trump’s had threatened to impose a staggering 245% import duties on Chinese goods. China didn’t hesitate to retaliate, vowing to raise its tariffs on American products to 125%.
A trade conflict between the two largest global economies reverberates across the international economy. It disrupts industrial supply chains, adjusts demand for commodities such as copper and oil, and even influences geopolitical stress points, like the Ukrainian conflict. Following a telephonic conversation with the Chinese leader Xi Jinping, President Trump expressed his anticipation for an in-person meeting later in the year, hinting at a potential invigoration for striking a deal.
If the negotiating parties don’t manage to uphold their temporary truce, trading tension could rise, potentially leading to an escalated tariff structure causing further economical harm. This vagueness could lead to businesses holding back on long-term investments and hiring while pumping up inflation.
The post Uncertainty Looms Over Extension of Tariff Respite on China appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
