The forthcoming expiration of a 90-day stay on elevated tariffs imposed on China, scheduled for Tuesday, is shrouded in ambiguity. Following the concluding session of the China-U.S. trade dialogues last month, both Chinese and American officials have indicated an expectation of a further 90-day extension of the deadline. However, the decision ultimately rests on the shoulders of U.S. President Donald Trump, a fact confirmed by the U.S. representatives.
Thus far, no formal communication has been made regarding whether the President is likely to back an extension or proceed with the implementation of the escalated tariffs. Businesses are stuck in an uncertain situation, and a potential choice to amp up the duties on import could trigger turbulence in global markets. The President has a history of revising deadlines and tariff percentages frequently, and it is currently uncertain what either side plans to do come Tuesday.
If the deadline for settling the trade deal with China is extended, it would serve as a buffer against looming threats of imposing tariffs as high as 245%. The purpose of these elevated tariffs is to balance the enormous and recurring U.S. trade deficit with China. This deficit plunged to a 21-year nadir in July as Chinese exports felt the heat from the possibility of tariff implementation.
It is quite a common practice for the U.S. to drop hints about the progress of ongoing negotiations. However, it’s a rarity for China to feed the media with information until significant decisions are reached. As of now, China has held back from making any premature statements prior to the deadline on Tuesday.
In a recent conversation, U.S. Vice-President JD Vance mentions the consideration of increasing tariffs on Beijing due to China’s procurement of Russian oil. Yet, he adds that the President ‘hasn’t made any concrete decisions’. If enacted, inflated tariffs on Chinese exports to the U.S. would exert considerable stress on Beijing, especially at a time when China’s economy, the second-largest globally, is bouncing back from a prolonged slump in the real estate market.
The aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic still lingers, leaving several individuals dependent on irregular ‘gig work’, which tightens the job market. Higher custom duties levied on minor consignments from China have also negatively impacted small-scale factories, accelerating layoffs. However, in many product categories, the U.S. heavily depends on Chinese imports. These ranges from everyday consumer goods and clothing outfits to complex entities like basic microchips, the rare earths necessary to produce these chips, wind turbine equipment, and electric vehicle batteries.
This dependency poses an advantageous situation for Beijing during its negotiations with Washington. Despite increased tariffs, China still retains a competitive edge on numerous product lines. Chinese leaders are cognizant that the American economy is only starting to grapple with the ripple effects of inflated prices incurred from tariff augmentation.
At present, goods imported from China attract a fundamental duty of 10%, in addition to an extra 20% tariff that is specific to the fentanyl issue. Some goods are subjected to even higher tariff percentages. Conversely, American exports heading to China attract a tariff around the 30% mark.
In the period preceding the ceasefire, the U.S. President had threatened to impose an import duty of 245% on Chinese commodities. Counteracting this, China pledged to escalate its tariff on U.S. items to a whopping 125%. This volatile back-and-forth between the planet’s two biggest economies has implications on a global scale, influencing facets such as industrial supply chains, the demand for global resources like oil and copper, and even intricate political issues including the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
After a recent telephonic interaction with China’s top leader Xi Jinping, President Trump expressed a desire to convene a meeting with Xi later this year. This desire to engage with China’s leadership should serve as motivation for striking a deal. However, in the event of a breakdown in this temporary peace, the strained trade situation could potentially explode, resulting in even steeper tariffs and consequently inflicting more severe damage on both economic superpowers and shaking up the world’s markets.
Should an escalation occur, businesses would likely hesitate to commit to new investments or expand their workforce, while inflation could see an abrupt spike. Thus, the gravity of this situation needs to be appropriately understood and handled with due sensitivity.
The post Uncertainty Surrounds Expiration of Trade Tariff Stay with China appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
