The past week witnessed an unprecedented motion in the United Nations Security Council, with the United States supporting a resolution that criticizes an Israeli offensive in Doha, Qatar. President Donald Trump personally backed this course of action, lauding Qatar’s endeavors as a vital U.S. partner in the pursuit of peace, despite the risks they are willingly shouldering.
The leadership of Trump has historically never telegraphed disapproval towards Israel within the framework of the Security Council. Contrastingly, he did direct the nation’s UN representative to veto a resolution which was asking for an immediate ceasefire and signaling a strong apprehension towards the devastating humanitarian crisis in Gaza. This humanitarian crisis involves a potential famine threat following the unfortunate loss of more than 20,000 Palestinian children.
Nevertheless, Trump stood firm in his support for a resolution advocating for Israel’s respect for Qatar’s sovereignty and territorial boundaries. Amidst the ongoing conflict in Gaza, however, Israel undertook aggressive actions against Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Iran, and Tunisia, with minimal response from President Trump regarding these nations’ sovereignty. An estimated count of casualties from these assaults in Lebanon alone was in thousands.
A tragic incident in Doha resulted in the loss of five lives. While the United States administration expressed their opposition to infringements of Qatar’s territorial rights, a different narrative emerges in regards to Ukraine, another U.S. ally. In the aftermath of the 2022 Russian incursion in Ukraine, a calamitous loss of approximately 80,000 Ukrainians as well as around 400,000 injuries ensued.
Contrastingly, Trump has shown apparent camaraderie with Vladimir Putin, who is widely recognized as the orchestrator of the Ukrainian tragedy. Putin was welcomed with open arms in the United States, with Trump publically endorsing him, thereby tacitly approving the ongoing conflict.
Even Denmark and Panama, recognized U.S. allies, have not been safe from Trump’s threats of forceful acquisitions. The subject of such threats have been Greenland belonging to Denmark, and the Panama Canal owned by Panama.
It would appear that Trump views global interactions in a transactional light. Recently, he has been expressing appreciation for a significant present received from Qatar. Though it is unclear whether this gift serves America’s interests, what is beyond doubt is Trump’s retention of this gift, inclusive of its enhancements worth around a billion dollars from American taxpayers, even after his presidential term.
Over the years, Trump has received substantial monetary rewards both directly and indirectly from different sources, including domestic media groups, foreign governments, executives from American businesses, and individuals dealing with the U.S. government. For example, exclusive access provided to Mar-a-Lago alone has reportedly enriched Trump’s coffers by about $125 million.
The revenues expand further when considering the family’s private equity venture, which is approximated to have added another $320 million. This additional wealth has primarily been generated through financial management for contributors belonging to affluent Persian Gulf nations, with Qatar being a significant partner.
The wealth accumulation doesn’t stop there. Over a billion dollars were generated from investments in cryptocurrency related projects. In total, an estimated $3.4 billion was acquired by Trump as personal gains during his presidential term. This valuation compiles all sources of income, portraying an impressive image of capital accumulation during his presidency.
Evidently, Trump’s approach suggests a paradoxical perspective. Despite an anti-immigration stance catapulting him into the presidency, he has made efforts to shield numerous undocumented immigrants from the scrutiny of ICE agents. Many of these protected individuals work in the hospitality sector.
Well known is the fact that many consider Washington a swamp, but under Trump’s administration, it can be referred to as a highly active cesspool, teetering on the brink of an eruption. This shift primarily harms citizens who lack the financial means to influence, those unable to fend off the adverse effects, and those aspiring for a more promising nation.
Those members of society who are dealing with the negative consequences are primarily the economically disadvantaged, who don’t have the resources to curry favor. Similarly affected are the politically vulnerable populations, who can’t resist the changes that do not favor them. Furthermore, individuals dreaming of a more promising future for the nation find themselves in a bitter struggle.
This contemporary state of affairs may represent the largest challenge for those attempting to explain the current political landscape to the next generation. They grapple with portraying a complex and intricate scenario that is often influenced by monetary power and self-interest.
In essence, the presidency in question has given rise to many ethical and moral quandaries. These concerns, coupled with geopolitical troubles and shifting allegiances, present challenges for future administrations looking to paint a different picture on the global stage.
The post Unprecedented U.S. Support for UN Resolution Criticizing Israeli Actions in Qatar appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
