An estimated 60,000 metric tons of edibles destined for global hunger-stricken areas are idling in various global depots, sufficient to provide a month’s sustenance to around 3.5 million people. Due to recent adjustments in US aid policy, untouched provisions are accumulating in storage facilities worldwide. Such facilities are primarily positioned in locations such as Djibouti, Durban, Dubai, and Houston, serving as transition points for food shipments to needy regions like Gaza and Sudan.
These changes in aid policies were initiated after the US government, under the leadership of former President Donald Trump, reduced financial support to the US Agency for International Development (USAID) in January. Consequently, supplies that were intended for famine-plagued territories are now stranded globally. If not addressed soon, these provisions are set to become unfit for consumption by the middle of the year, possibly being relegated to functioning as animal fodder.
The stranded stocks, sourced from various American agricultural entities and manufacturers, form a part of the operations of USAID’s Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance (BHA). Worth north of $98 million, these resources, if distributed, could maintain over a million individuals for a trimester or offer six weeks’ nutrition to all inhabitants of Gaza.
The present predicament accentuates our global struggle against food scarcity, with the World Food Programme stating that acute food insecurity plagues approximately 343 million people worldwide. Approximately 1.9 million of these individuals grapple with extreme starvation.
Population segments in Sudan and Gaza are heavily impacted, but similar situations of desperate hunger also envelop parts of South Sudan, Haiti, and Mali. Despite the U.S. government permitting waivers for some aid operations, the supplies are confined to the warehouses due to abrupt contract terminations and a lack of funds necessary to compensate suppliers and contractors.
There has been discussion about entrusting the inventory to aid entities capable of managing distribution, but approval from the State Department’s Office of Foreign Assistance is pending. This entire scenario is further complicated by the potential layoffs looming at USAID, with most of its personnel on the chopping block by autumn this year.
The United Nations figures highlight United States’ significant contribution to global aid, accounting for about 38% of all aid contributions worldwide. In the previous year alone, the United States donated a total of $61 billion in foreign aid, over half of which was channeled through USAID.
The food aid provided by the United States consists principally of ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF), such as high-energy biscuits and Plumpy’Nut, a life-saving peanut-based paste. However, these crucial products find themselves among the entrapped stocks.
Expressing concern over the ongoing circumstances, Navyn Salem, the founder of Edesia, a manufacturer of Plumpy’Nut based in the US, revealed that the termination of transportation agreements with USAID resulted in the immobilization of 5,000 tons of the nutritious paste, enough to feed over 484,000 children.
Even amid such adversities, Salem remains hopeful that solutions will be found to ensure the life-saving food reaches the young ones relying on it for survival. However, the implications of the aid cuts are manifesting negatively, resulting in tragic incidents as reported by Action Against Hunger.
The charity, which depended on the US for over 30% of its global budget, concluded that the funding cuts led to the suspension of some of their programs in the Congo, with devastating effects. Lack of essential aids reportedly caused the deaths of at least six children enrolled in their programs.
Equally affected is the International Rescue Committee (IRC), a large portion of whose funds arrived from the US. Jeanette Bailey, the IRC’s Nutrition Director, revealed that as a result of the cuts, IRC was forced to retrench many of its programs.
Bailey pointed out that fully understanding and quantifying the extensive impact of the aid cuts is a formidable task, even more so in places where aid has been fully suspended. Nevertheless, she contended with a grim reminder that lack of access to treatment in stabilization centers places about 60% of afflicted children at an immediate risk of death.
In such dire circumstances, the failures in the food aid pipeline illustrate the technical and political complexities of humanitarian endeavors, where policy changes and bureaucratic hurdles can inadvertently lead to starvation and death of millions.
The counterproductive detention of food supplies meant for the world’s disadvantaged demonstrates an urgent need to revisit and streamline humanitarian logistics across the globe. It is essential for stakeholders and policy makers to work together and prioritize life over politics.
All these instances serve as stark realities of the world we live in, where tons of food are trapped within logistical bottlenecks while millions die of hunger. It brings focus to the pressing need for efficient and compassionate strategic planning in the delivery and dispensation of humanitarian aid on a global scale.
The post US Aid Policy Changes Strand Food Supplies Meant for Hunger-Stricken Areas appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
