J.D Vance, the vice president of the United States, once stated while hosting The Charlie Kirk Show that if it were not for Charlie Kirk, he may not hold the position he does today. This statement probably holds true to a certain extent as it was Kirk who primarily advocated for Vance’s vice-presidential nomination. This scenario has unveiled the pervasion of political podcasters into the nucleus of political operations, often serving as pivotal players in the shaping of agendas. The relationship between the MAGA movement and such influencers is so intermingled that discerning a demarcation is challenging.
Indeed, the MAGA movement has managed to overpower the Republican party entirely over the last decade. Its synergistic bond with influencers like Kirk has pushed traditional media outlets into the background in the battle for influence. Kirk’s campus-driven group, Turning Point USA, is a rousing example of this phenomenon. This group, disguised as a grassroots operation, served predominantly as a dispenser for Trump’s ideas.
Kirk and Vance, both enjoying a close personal relationship, saw their combined agenda impacted by the unexpected demise of Kirk. Undoubtedly, this event shook the vice president profoundly. Yet, looking ahead to the 2028 elections, Vance stands as the prospective nominee, inheriting not just Kirk’s organizational assets but also his vast audience.
Last week, Kamala Harris was seen airing her grievances about feeling neglected as Vice President, often left dealing with the less attractive aspects of policy due to a president reluctant to share the limelight. Vance has recognized the potential in leveraging the power that being a podcaster offers, a formidable tool that often trumps his current position.
As the MAGA movement gains momentum under its second innings in government, their kinship with the podcasting world remains unbroken. Expounding on their genesis, Vance and Tucker Carlson, the guest on Vance’s tribute to Kirk, discussed how Kirk first reached out to Vance having seen him on Carlson’s past Fox News program.
Earlier this year, Karoline Leavitt, the White House Press Secretary, toyed with a novel press briefing style, showcasing a competition among participants to pose the most groveling queries. It provided clear evidence of how the Trump administration has devolved into a regime run for and by podcasters, where offbeat channels serve to divert attention away from conventional news sources.
The Democrats, on the other hand, solely boast of Pod Save America in their good times for their podcast listeners. However, it does nothing to offset the hostility that the current administration harbors towards mainstream media. This animosity stems from the new avenues available for attracting public attention, none of which involve the traditional press.
Facilitating this diversification is the control that MAGA allies have over platforms such as X, Rumble, and Truth Social, led by Trump himself. Additionally, financing from Trump-friendly investors is poised to take over TikTok. Even Mark Zuckerberg, who recently expressed plans to invest heavily in U.S. data infrastructure at Trump’s behest, is seen standing in solidarity with the president.
Simultaneously, actions are being undertaken against traditional news outlets, including suing them. Conservatives might frame this as victory in the intellectual marketplace but, when they are also intent on purchasing that very marketplace, the claim sounds empty, to say the least.
In light of the past week, platforms such as X, which are key distribution channels for numerous podcasts and facilitate interaction among their creators, have reflected a vivid flashback to the tumultuous scenes on Twitter following George Floyd’s murder in 2020. Websites like ‘Expose Charlie’s Murderers’ are sprouting up, purporting to catalogue individuals celebrating Kirk’s death – a response steeped in both intense outrage and deep-seated sorrow.
Though such platforms may, at times, spotlight genuine misconduct, they run the risk of becoming an unchecked forum for personal revenge and unsubstantiated defamation. A significant population of conservative podcasters, despite denouncing the culture of cancelation at its peak, are attempting to justify similar smear campaigns of their own, claiming their circumstances as being ‘distinct’ from others.
This triggers a crucial question: who has the right to determine what is considered offensive and repugnant? Could a commentary on ‘prowling Blacks’ or an argument pushing a 10-year old rape survivor to bear her assaulter’s child be grotesque in nature? Allowing for the justification of such discussions that Charlie Kirk was known to drive is a gross debasement of freedom.
Conversely, capitalizing on Kirk’s death to limit free speech stands utterly contradictory to his friends’ constant reminders of Kirk’s ardor for individual rights. However, this conflict seems unsurprising when one observes an administration whose prime focus is on podcasting.
While parts of American life stubbornly resist the MAGA movement’s theatrical declarations, like the economy that refuses to be intimidated into growth, the podcast sector seems exceedingly influential in establishing new standards, disseminating taboos, and enhancing the administration’s stronghold.
The post Vance Stumbles into VP Role Thanks to Disgraced Kirk Influence appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
