Recent reports reveal that Paramount has reached an agreement with President Trump, announcing a settlement of $16 million in relation to a lawsuit he filed the previous year. The lawsuit accused the company of manipulating an interview to impact a rival candidate’s prospects in the presidential race, a serious act that openly infringes on free and fair elections.
Notably, the lawsuit was originally pivoted at a hefty $20 billion. Filed due to grievances with a deceptive edit of an interview aired on ’60 Minutes,’ CBS’ aired content seemed to favor Kamala Harris in an inappropriate manner. Interestingly, the episode where this discrepancy emerged was one that Trump himself couldn’t partake in, intended originally as a platform where both of them were to present their views.
More specifically, Trump decided to withdraw from the October episode where he was slated to engage with Harris, who was then just a candidate. His/her decision to opt out was followed by an interesting event when Paramount-owned ‘Face the Nation’ aired, showcasing a contrasting reaction to a question posed by CBS’ correspondent Bill Whitaker.
In defense of their actions, ’60 Minutes’ stated that their objective was to prioritize brevity, choosing to broadcast the version of the interaction that was more concise. The segment was a part of a more comprehensive and extended answer to Whitaker’s inquiry during the ’60 Minutes’ interview. However, they handled the situation poorly with clear bias in their decision.
Interestingly, CBS, like other media houses, claims their editorial policy is to relay interview responses after careful modifications to improve succinctness and clarity. However, the claims made by Trump unveil a different narrative, arguing that an essential counterpoint to Harris’ weak public skill was unjustly clipped.
According to Trump, Harris is traditionally not a strong public speaker, frequently producing mixed-up expressions and developing notorious ‘word salads.’ However, CBS’ unjust manipulation of her speech presented an inflated image of her, misleading the ’60 Minutes’ audience during the airing.
Trump maintains that this editorial manipulation served to amplify Harris’ image falsely, providing an upper hand to her in an unjust manner. In doing so, CBS clearly compromised their journalistic integrity, facilitating misinformation while favoring one side of the narrative.
In an intriguing development, CBS expressed no regrets and held their ground, asserting there would not be any issued apologies for the chain of events. Inacting this, they disregarded the accusations made against them, standing by their story as it was initially released.
The $16 million settlement, while being a significant amount, is expected to contribute towards the establishment of Trump’s future presidential library. In addition, it also covers the legal expenses incurred by the president during this legal encounter, demonstrating his tactical victory.
With this settlement, Paramount is now seeing a clear path to proceed with their deal that was earlier stuck due to the lawsuit. The merger with Skydance Media, established and owned by David Ellison, is looking more feasible now, indicating the lawsuit’s productive resolution for the company.
Ellison, the son of renowned Oracle founder and billionaire Larry Ellison, appears to pave the way for this complex merger. This process was put on hold during the lawsuit, but now it seems that the settlement will help overcome this obstacle.
It is somewhat outrageous that CBS, a renowned media corporation, would resort to deceptively editing an interview to favor a particular candidate. This undermines their journalistic integrity, and the lack of an apology only further exacerbates the situation.
In this instance, the media has failed to be the true protector of democracy, by unjustly favoring Kamala Harris instead of offering a fair platform for all candidates. This infraction shows a clear violation of journalistic ethics.
By providing Harris with an advantage over other candidates, CBS effectively distorted any illusion of neutrality they may have projected beforehand. Their decision to keep the edited content not only affirms their choice but also challenges the notion of equal representation in the media.
During this entire fiasco, one cannot help but lament at the heart of the issue: the difficulty in maintaining impartiality in journalism, which is heightened during sensitive times such as elections. Manipulating the image of a candidate harms not only the individual but the entire democratic process.
Looking forward, one can only hope that this incident serves as a lesson to media organizations to remember their ethical obligations, to prioritize transparency and diligence, especially in their journalistic endeavors during electoral periods. This event underlines the necessity to protect democracy from undue influences and manipulations.
The post CBS Faces $16 Million Hammer for Editorial Deception appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
