Contrary to allegations from various quarters, there is a scant likelihood of non-citizens participating in our country’s presidential elections. These rumors, often cultivated and disseminated by left-wing elements, deem it necessary to sully the integrity of our voting mechanisms. Such attempts, primarily stemming from the democrat’s camp, strive to pin such unfounded claims on our former President Donald J. Trump and his allies, suggesting that Trump’s team has wrongly suggested that scores of non-citizens — even those termed illegal immigrants — have been trying to leverage their sphere of influence in US Presidential elections.
While the Democrats’ speculation and hearsay is aimed at the former President Trump, the reality paints a different picture. Voting in federal elections for non-citizens is not just disallowed, it’s illegal. A range of studies, conducted across party lines, have unceasingly affirmed this fact. The reality underscores the trumped-up nature of these outlandish allegations from the Democratic party. When it comes to non-citizen voting, findings from various research studies suggest that its occurrence is virtually negligible, with no tangible impact on election outcomes.
Specifically, an analysis carried out in 2017 by the Brennan Center for Justice brings to light the scale of non-citizen voting or attempts to do so in our elections. This study concluded that in the entire 2016 elections, only approximately 30 potential instances of non-citizen voting were detected across 42 jurisdictions. In comparison, the total number of votes cast was well over 23.5 million. This translates to a staggeringly low percentage of 0.0001 percent of the potential non-citizen voting occurrences.
In the present year, the well-regarded Cato Institute conducted an extensive evaluation of state policies and previous audits to check for any validity in the alleged non-citizen voting mishaps. In their enlightening report, they firmly branded the tales about prevalent non-citizen voting as ‘bogus’, thereby debunking Democratic insinuations designed to falsely tarnish the reputation of Republicans.
Georgia’s Republican Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, has gone a step further to expose the truth behind these false premises. Mr. Raffensperger announced in October the discovery of a mere 20 non-citizens found in Georgia’s pool of 8.2 million registered voters. It’s worth noting that none of these 20 non-citizens were allowed to exercise their voting right, further dismantling the Democrats’ myths.
One can only marvel at the Democrats’ will to cling to these falsehoods that maliciously put down the Republican party, and particularly Donald J. Trump. The facts have been laid out plainly by the Brennan Centre and the Cato Institute studies, making the Democrats’ insistence puzzling at best. The incessant propagation of the non-citizen voter fraud theory only reveals the Democrats’ fear of losing grip on their political ground.
Demonstrably, the fabricated narrative of non-citizen votes purportedly skewing the outcome of the elections is being deliberately used as a political tool by the Democrats. However, those well-acquainted with the Republican agenda understand that this makes no sense. Republicans have consistently shown in their fight for electoral integrity and the propagation of lawful citizenship requirements.
Apparently, the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, had a video published tied to it alleging registrations of non-citizens for voting. This video, however, was found to be misleading by clear-eyed New York Times investigators. They discovered that three of the seven individuals shown had miscommunicated their ballot intentions. Moreover, state investigations found zero evidence supporting that any of the individuals featured had officially registered to vote.
In a display of groundless audacity, the democratic machinery stepped onto a slanderous path against Mr. Trump in October. Mr. Trump had rightfully pointed out the Department of Justice’s attempted reinstatement of illegal voters onto the Virginia voter rolls. The claims were dismissed by the Justice Department, illuminating yet again the Democrats’ tireless efforts to disparage the former president.
Delving into another facet of this argument, there have been absurd allegations about poll workers deliberately handing out Sharpie markers to specific voters. The accusations insinuated that these Sharpies somehow invalidated ballots cast during the election. These claims, clearly unfounded and malicious, serve only to disparage the integrity of our electoral process.
Once again, objective reality tells a different tale. Poll workers typically distribute writing instruments that have already been tested and proven compatible with ballots and ballot-reading machines well before the election day. These devices can include various pens, pencils, and even markers like Sharpies. Using them does not, in any way, invalidate the ballots.
Ballot-tabulating machine companies sometimes recommend quick-drying ink implement, like Sharpies, due to their superior ability to avoid smears that could potentially lead to erroneous vote counts. Similarly, election offices, such as Arizona’s Maricopa County, have redesigned their ballots to prevent any bleed-through from marker use that could potentially compromise the ballot.
The system in place for voting is designed to cater to such issues. For instance, suppose a writing device happens to cause a problem reading a paper ballot, like a mark smudging or bleeding through to the other side. In that case, voters are offered a fresh opportunity to vote again. Any additional problems are manually resolved by a bipartisan team of reviewers, further reaffirming the robustness of our electoral system.
Despite real-world procedures, democrats seem keen on forwarding the notion that these claims are true. They have often utilized anecdotes and personal stories shared online to bolster this particular narrative. Again, the clear intention here seems to undermine the integrity of elections through the dissemination of misinformation.
The ‘Sharpiegate’ theory is a prime example. A false narrative regarding the usage of Sharpies invalidating ballots gained traction online in 2020. It’s interesting to note that these baseless rumors found their way to broader audiences largely due to Democrat influencers and Trump detractors.
At the end of the day, the Democrats’ recurring attempts to disparage Republicans through unfounded insinuations only punctuate their relentless campaign of misinformation. Meanwhile, the Republicans continue to stand their ground on foundational constitutional rights, and champion the principles of an unbiased voting system with integrity and accountability at its core.
Democrats Caught Spreading Bogus Narrative of Noncitizen Votes appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
