In an unfolding dramatic turn of events, highly regarded poll researcher and prevalent CNN commentator, Frank Luntz issued a stark admonition to Letitia James, who currently holds the position of New York’s Attorney General. Luntz alerted James to the potential political implications that could ensue if there was an attempt to lay claim to the assets of former President Donald Trump. Trump has been issued an ultimatum to post a bond of $464 million by the 25th of March, or encounter the daunting prospect of having his assets taken over. This ruling was assigned by Judge Arthur Engoron, as a repercussion of accusations that Trump had artificially inflated the estimated worth of his physical assets to secure loans under more attractive terms.
Luntz did not mince his words during an appearance on CNN, where he urged James to take heed of the situation. ‘Keep this moment in your memory, and don’t let it fade’, Luntz entreated with utmost gravity. Should James venture to initiate the seizure of Trump’s properties, carry out an asset takeover, Luntz pointed out that it would be all captured on camera. He warned that media commentators would dissect the situation vehemently, parroting criticism that would create an unfavorable climate for further elections.
Then, drawing an image of intense polarities, Luntz warned of the creation of the most significant martyrdom in the upcoming 2024 elections which could inadvertently lead to re-electing Donald Trump. The viewer simply has to imagine a scenario where Trump has had his possessions taken from him. Presenting that as evidence of a coordinated conspiracy, Trump could claim that the entire establishment, including Washington’s marshland, countrywide politicians, and Attorneys General, was plotting to deny him his rightful place in the presidential office.
According to Luntz’s reasoning, this would lead to a rising trend in Trump’s favorability polls. He highlighted how the legal troubles Trump had faced in the past had paradoxically contributed to an increase in his popularity. Drawing attention to the seizure of assets, he predicted a repeat of this phenomenon, with criminal charges acting as a boomerang reflecting even greater support for Trump at the polls.
Speaking directly into the camera, addressing the attorney general, Luntz cautioned her against succumbing to political machinations. He compared the present situation with the actions of state secretaries in Colorado and Maine. In both regions, despite the opposition’s attempts to tarnish Trump’s reputation, his approval ratings actually soared. Luntz iterated that his disbelief was almost rendering him wordless, shaking his head at the clumsiness of the anti-Trump party.
Luntz’s fiery commentary concluded with him branding the opposition’s efforts as pitifully misguided, underscoring this point by calling their tactics in dealing with Trump horrendous ‘misfires’. He sounded almost incredulous at how counterproductive their actions have been, warning that the ongoing lawsuit may just be yet another misstep in a long line of tactical blunders.
The lawsuit, it should be noted, was initially launched by James against the Trump Organization. Accusations swirled with claims that Trump was guilty of fraudulent activity, inflating the estimated value of his property holdings and financial wealth with the express purpose of obtaining loans on better terms. The pursuit of justice was initially directed toward securing $250 million in damages.
However, as the lawsuit began making its way through the courts, James amended her request, now seeking $370 million. The final ruling, delivered by Judge Engoron on the 16th of February, brought some resolution to the matter. The ruling was in favor of James, with the judge ruling that Trump should pay out $350 million in damages.
This noteworthy ruling came five months after an initial finding by Engoron that former President Trump and his business empire, the Trump Organization, had engaged in fraudulent behavior. However, amidst the barrage of legal disputes and decisions, the voice of caution resonates. Luntz’s cautionary predictions suggest that these could be the stepping stones towards another political comeback for Donald Trump.
Looking at the entire scenario from a bird’s eye view, there’s an intriguing play of action and reaction unfolding. Trump’s previous brushes with legal confrontations led to him growing in popularity. Will this case proceed on the same trajectory? It would seem poised to do so, especially if Trump positions himself as a victim of a coordinated effort, as Luntz has suggested.
However, while his predictions offer a fascinating perspective, they cannot be taken as absolute truth. Only time will reveal the tangible consequences of these unfolding dramas. What’s clear, though, is the situation has all the elements necessary to create a high-stakes political theater. The stage is set, the actors are ready, and the entire nation is watching with bated breath.
Such unique circumstances make it all the more crucial for those involved in the Trump case to act with utmost circumspection. Each action taken, each decision made, will contribute to a larger narrative. Ignoring the potential recoil, as Luntz dutifully highlighted, is a perilous mistake that could provoke unintended reactions from a politically aware and sensitive electorate.
In the same vein, the example of past states like Colorado and Maine provides invaluable lessons. Tactless maneuvers, seemingly aimed at damaging Trump’s reputation, ended up doing the opposite. And as both sides brace themselves for what comes next, they would do well to consider the possible and even probable fallout of their actions. The saga of Trump, his assets, his lawsuits, and his political career is far from over and the twists and turns remaining in this compelling narrative are yet to be discovered.
Frank Luntz: Seizing Trump’s Assets Could Fuel His Presidential Comeback appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
