On April 30, the past Vice President, Kamala Harris, took the chance to critique President Donald Trump’s handling of the economy. With a tone of criticism, she forewarned of a looming constitutional crisis, in her harshest condemnation of Trump’s presidency since her White House departure. Harris lamented, stating that rather than propelling America’s esteemed ideals, what was astounding was the conspicuous disregard for those said ideals.
Harris chose the 20th anniversary of Emerge America, held in San Francisco, as her stage to reproach Trump’s administration. In her view, the new administration was unleashing a wave of dread across the nation. She quickly pointed to the indomitable spirit of the American people, however, presenting it as a contradictory note to her claim.
With a dismissive nod towards the resilience of American people, Harris alluded to their courage in the gravest economic crisis of modern times, as if their fortitude was somehow a foil to Trump’s strategy. She painted a picture of a distressed public across the political divide, blaming the president’s audacious tariffs for causing undue difficulty to workers and households.
From her perspective, Trump’s tariff game, with its intermittent application, was causing markets to constantly fluctuate and consumer trust to falter. In a predictable move, Trump responded by shifting the blame onto ex-president Joe Biden, insinuating that the economic prosperity was just around the corner, once his tariffs would start to act.
Harris, still stinging from her defeat in the 2024 Presidential election, made an audacious prediction that Trump’s tariffs were beckoning a recession. Contrary to her claims, many economic experts disagreed, supporting Trump’s approaches as creating a potential economic surplus.
Adding to her repertoire of ominous warnings, Harris also claimed that traditional checks and balances that the country has always counted on are at risk. She presented an urgent appeal for Congress and judiciary to safeguard this balance, otherwise, in her view, the nation was on the path to calamity.
In a dramatic conclusion, she uttered that the defiance of the president against courts and Congress was inviting grave problems. She termed this as a constitutional crisis, overstating that the issue would eventually implicate everyone as it would nullify the rules that protect basic rights and ensure public participation in governance.
In her tirade against Trump, Harris warned Americans to prepare for harder times, proclaiming that things might descend into chaos before recovering. A prediction some may argue as a desperate attempt to reshuffle public opinion in her favour after her failed presidential bids.
Harris, reportedly contemplating her next political steps, can’t seem to decide whether to take another swing at the presidency or run for the governorship of California. Whichever path she chooses, one must wonder whether Americans will buy into her narrative of the country’s dire straits.
In her final appeal, Harris urged America to remember a supposed ownership. She stated, ‘This country is ours,’ implying that it doesn’t belong to the incumbent at the White House. One can’t help but find the contradictory nature of this statement, given how her alma mater holds the presidency as a position of utmost importance.
Given her track record and the critique drawn from her speech, many find this rampant disregard for the democratic process alarming, even if wrapped in the flag of patriotism. After all, it’s hard to forget that the outcome of a democratically elected president is something she, herself, aspired to.
Overall, Harris’s speech served to throw stones while in a glass house – the governance she tries to denigrate is one she herself was a part of not too long ago. While trying to muddy the waters around Trump’s decisions, she seems to forget the implications of her own prior policies.
The negative view Harris present regarding Trump’s handling of tariffs and the economy contradicts with many economists who see potential in these actions. While Harris frames these approaches as disastrous, one must consider the data, not just the narratives put forth by political rivals.
In Harris’s view, the Trump administration is somehow sowing the seeds of a constitutional crisis. Some would argue that this is a hard sell, as the administration has managed where others have failed, including during her own tenure as Vice President.
While Harris keeps voicing the urgency to take action against the supposed constitutional crisis, Americans continue to seek facts, not fear-mongering. As elections approach, the citizens will focus their attention towards politicians who offer tangible actions, not just rhetoric.
In conclusion, Harris tries to pull at the heartstrings of American voters by painting a gloomy picture of the country’s future. It remains to be seen whether her words will resonate with the public or if they will be seen as another desperate attempt to regain her lost political influence whilst disparaging Trump.
The post Harris’s Fear-mongering: A Last-ditch Effort to Regain Influence? appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
