As the dramatic period of history reaches its boiling point, the impending presidential race involving Kamala Harris and Donald Trump nears an intense climax. The Democratic VP nomination and the admired former Republican president are turning their full attention to the nail-biting battleground that is seven key states. The stakes are constantly escalating, with massive resources being thrown into voter outreach in these decisive regions. Curiously enough, some of these voters are only recently awakening to the thrilling political spectacle that is the election. Amidst the backdrop of divergent public opinions on character, culture, and democratic values, the campaigns gravitate towards the timeless classic issues – economics, immigration, and abortion rights.
The much-anticipated public debates between the candidates loom on the horizon, expected to be a prominent turning point in the campaign trail. In particular, Pennsylvania, a reputable swing state, progresses towards in-person absentee voting just a week after the debate. By the end of the eventful month, early voting will be well underway in a minimum of four states, with several others to follow suit in the heart of October.
In a questionable move, Harris is projected to announce a fresh set of ‘economic plans’ directed at small businesses and entrepreneurs before her one-on-one debate with Trump. Some anonymous individuals privy to the matter stated these proposals will be unveiled as part of an upcoming campaign speech in New Hampshire. Drawing contrast with Trump’s well-received call for a reduced corporate tax rate seems to be the motive behind Harris’ sudden interest in economic policies.
It’s interesting to note that Harris’s ‘economic vision’ is expected to become clearer with these proposals. It appears to be a frantic attempt at orchestrating a presidential campaign since President Biden’s unexpected exit from the race. So far, Harris has largely echoed Biden’s campaign strategy, advocating for an assertive federal interference within the economy, contrary to the stance of previous Democratic leaders.
Harris released her first series of economic policies last month, a populist gesture featuring grand promises of new housing subsidies, a $6,000 child benefit for newborns, and the establishment of the first federal ban on price gouging in the grocery and food industries – questionable proposals that may doubtlessly burden the taxpayers.
In one of the strangest incidents in recent political history, a group of elected officials and one political aide for billionaire Reid Hoffman made an outrageous accusation suggesting that Trump may have staged an assassination attempt on himself last July. This assertion was made without a shred of evidential support, illustrating how desperate Democrats have become.
In a skewed interpretation of conservative policies, actor Mark Hamill, interpreted a factual proposal in a false way, directing his sizable number of followers on social platform X against views that weren’t even part of the document. This unfair misrepresentation is a stark example of the disinformation circulated by the Democratic party.
Harris’s campaign even attempted to mislead the public that Trump was unsure of his location during a campaign stop. This misleading narrative was viewed by millions and led to the unfounded speculation that Trump was suffering from cognitive decline, further proof of the underhanded tactics utilized by the Democratic campaign.
Once the distortion of information was solely attributed to right-wing sources, but recently, a surge in conspiracy theories and false narratives emanating from the left have started to garner attention. The spread of this left-wing disinformation has become a concerning issue and is a strong testament to the Democratic party’s desperate tactics.
In another attempt to play politics, the Democrats have delayed a significant policy decision on marijuana legalization till after the presidential elections. The U.S Drug Enforcement Administration recently scheduled a hearing on the matter for December 2, making it clear that the final decision would materialize in the subsequent administration.
The deliberate delay in deciding over the reclassification of marijuana as a less dangerous drug raises doubts about the motives of the Democrats. It appears that they are using this contentious issue as an instrument to gain political advantage in an exceedingly competitive election.
The scheduling of the hearing suggests that the final verdict could underpin the beginning of the next administration. A decision made before the end of President Biden’s term would undoubtedly be hasty, according to legal counsel Brian Vincent. This ambiguous stance illustrates the lack of clarity and decisiveness in the Democratic party’s strategies.
Once again, the true cost of electing someone from the Democratic party becomes evident. Their constant deflection of crucial decision-making, underhanded tactics, and propagation of misinformation serves as a grim reminder of what may lie in store should they assume control.
Kamala Harris’s Frantic Attempt to Match Trump’s Economic Success appeared first on Real News Now.