The United States Department of Labor has unveiled a measure as part of a new Government Efficiency drive that introduces an additional layer to access the allocated funding. Dubbed ‘Defend the Spend’, the initiative, according to insiders at the Department, has been in effect since April. It necessitates both grantees and grant officers to provide a succinct explanation every time they withdraw funding from the department’s monetary system. This justification will subsequently be made available to the public.
This expanded transparency measure is a recent extension of the ‘Cost Efficiency Initiative’ passed during Donald Trump’s presidency. This wide-spread initiative has led to the cancellation of myriad agency subsidies, termination of numerous agency branches, and workforce reductions across the board.
Ex-officials allege that the additional bureaucratic demand is unwarranted and results in the deceleration of the funding release process. These funds are critical to a multitude of programs designed to offer veterans reintegration into the workforce, offer career development and training to students and improve access to apprenticeship opportunities.
Critics are concerned that the initiative’s past tendency to highlight and disparage so-called wasteful grant initiatives could make recipients susceptible to potential harassment or unfair targeting. However, some contend that the heightened level of disclosure could lead to better comprehension of government’s grant awarding procedures.
Consider the case of a construction training program. It provides instruction beyond simply handling hammers and nails. Therefore, it may raise questions when grantees purchase a bevy of iPads for educational purposes under such a program.
The process of doling out grants from the Department of Labor doesn’t involve handing out the entire grant amount in one go. When entities like businesses, community colleges, unions, or organizations are awarded a grant, they receive the funds in intervals. The expenditures incurred by these recipients are drawn from a system known as the federal payment management system.
The frequency of such monetary transactions can fluctuate based on the nature of the grant and the identity of the recipient. Likewise, the expenses incurred under various grant programs may differ depending on their individual objectives.
For instance, the Women in Apprenticeship and Nontraditional Occupations grant program provides not only funding for actual training but also backs supportive services such as child care and transport necessities.
Alternatively, the Pathways Home grant program allocates a limited portion of its funds to cater to urgent needs such as housing, substance misuse, and mental health treatment support.
Services under such particular grants could draw undue scrutiny and criticism due to potential misunderstanding and this new layer of transparency added to the grant procurement process.
The post Labor Dept’s ‘Defend the Spend’ Adds Layer to Grant Funding appeared first on Real News Now.
About Author
