On Monday, the Supreme Court rejected a petition submitted by a Republican presidential contender with little chances of success. The candidate sought to prevent former President Donald Trump from appearing on the ballot due to his alleged connection to the January 6, 2021 disturbances at the Capitol.
The court rendered its decision in a manner consistent with its customary practice of declining to hear cases without providing any accompanying rationale or vote record.
The lawsuit was initiated by John Anthony Castro, a tax attorney and frequent candidate who altered his party membership from Democrat to Republican subsequent to the 2020 election.
Castro made the claim that President Trump had potentially contravened a provision under the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution, which prohibits an individual from seeking public office if they have “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” or have “given aid or comfort” to those involved in such activities.
Although the ruling brings a certain degree of resolution for Trump’s legal team, they are still confronted with legal obstacles at the state level in Minnesota and Colorado. Additionally, election authorities in other states, including as New Hampshire, have discussed pursuing comparable objections.
In his legal submissions, Castro asserted his intention to seek judicial relief as a candidate apparently presenting a challenge to President Trump for the Republican Party’s nomination.
According to Castro’s statement to the court, “A primary candidate has judicial standing to bring a claim challenging the eligibility of a fellow primary candidate for competitive injury in the form of a diminution of votes and/or fundraising if the primary candidate believes that the fellow primary candidate is ineligible to hold public office and to prevent actions irreconcilable with the U.S. Constitution.”
“The framers of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment specifically designed it to remove overwhelming popular pro-insurrectionists from the ballot. As such, Castro is not simply within the ‘zone’ of interests; Castro is the precise type of person that the framers of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment specifically sought to politically protect while Trump is the precise type of person they sought to disqualify,” he continued.
Castro’s lack of qualification for many GOP debates and limited coverage in press pieces discussing the field suggests that he is not perceived as a significant danger to the president. President Trump vehemently refuted any association with the J6 riots and characterized the judicial proceedings against him as a concerted “witch hunt” orchestrated by adversaries aiming to impede his potential victory over President Joe Biden in the upcoming election cycle.
On Monday, startling video evidence captured within the confines of the New York State courthouse depicted Attorney General Letitia James intently observing former President Donald Trump in close proximity, mere moments prior to the commencement of his trial on charges of fraud.
The presence of cameras in the courtroom during the trial was not anticipated, and the provided video clip seems to have been recorded by a single camera operator gathering supplementary footage prior to the commencement of the proceedings. Donald Trump has been convicted of engaging in fraudulent activities related to his commercial ventures. On Monday morning, he made an appearance in court, where the judge is currently evaluating the case and determining the suitable penalty.
During the interview conducted by Fox News host Bill Hemmer of guest Jonathan Turley over the phone, the shocking scene was captured on camera, surprising Hemmer.
The visual content presented to the audience encompassed a somber, grave, and indignant ex-president, followed by a captivating depiction of Attorney General James observing the defendant from a distance. Immediately preceding this instance, the Trump Team disseminated a comprehensive opposition file over electronic mail, with the explicit purpose of discrediting and ridiculing the claims spearheaded by James.
Upon exiting the courtroom, the camera operator seemingly caught Judge Arthur Engoron off guard, prompting him to react with a lighthearted camera angle, a smile, and a nonchalant shrug, which were visible to all present. Prior to this incident, Engoron had also been subjected to a social media attack by Trump, which occurred a few hours prior.
Judge Engoron looks to have proved Trump’s point that the case is a witch hunt brought by a racist attorney general who hates him.
A first look at Trump inside the court room as the $250 million civil fraud trial against him in New York begins. pic.twitter.com/zKdsTX2Aax
— MSNBC (@MSNBC) October 2, 2023
Trump arrived at a New York court for the lawsuit that corrupt NY AG Letitia James brought against him, and someone was live-streaming. The judge kicked the person out after he realized it proved Trump was right about the “witch hunt” case and helped his election chances. pic.twitter.com/DXKzr0qoZr
— Just Jeff From Cali (@liberty_clarion) October 2, 2023
Trump made a lengthy statement in his defense prior to entering the courtroom. CNN stopped showing it after a few seconds, but Fox News allowed it.
BREAKING: Donald Trump speaks before entering court in New York pic.twitter.com/nfknwxA8Yz
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) October 2, 2023
The Associated Press reported “The fraud lawsuit that could cost former President Donald Trump control of some of his most prized prized properties went on trial Monday, with New York state lawyers vowing to hold him accountable while he denounced the case as a politically motivated “scam.””
Trump posted this on Monday morning:
“JUST ARRIVED AT THE COURTHOUSE TO FIGHT A CORRUPT & RACIST ATTORNEY GENERAL, AND A ROGUE, OUT OF CONTROL, TRUMP HATING JUDGE, WHO REFUSES TO FOLLOW THE APPELLATE COURT DECISION WHICH KNOKS OUT 80% OF THIS SHAM CASE. THIS IS THE CONTINUATION OF THE GREATEST WITCH HUNT OF ALL TIME. ELECTION INTERFERENCE!”
Source: Yahoo News
The post Supreme Court Just Gave Trump Huge Unexpected VICTORY appeared first on The Republic Brief.